................The Ramchargers used to advance the 509 8*...........to get bottom end out of it.......kim...........
Put in a 4.30+ gear and let out of the clutch at 3k. The engine combo might find zen there.
More info is needed. Who built this motor? Did they know what they were doing? what is the compression ratio? Was the block machined properly?
A 509 cam and 750 DP is not 1970 "stock specs".
Ditch the cam, put in a Lunati VooDoo grind and swap the intake for a Performer RPM dual plane.
What do you guys think would be a good cam i wasnt the lumpy sound and what intake
You'll get a lot of different answers on this question, but i'll agree with "lilcuda". May have to check hood clearence with the RPM though. And i'll choose this cam.
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/LUN-60303/
Throw that cam away... it's way too much cam for that engine. You need something in the [email protected] range and it'll sing. That combo would be lucky if its got 8.5:1 CR.
Throw that cam away... it's way too much cam for that engine. You need something in the [email protected] range and it'll sing. That combo would be lucky if its got 8.5:1 CR.
I would check your ignition curve before swapping cams. Theres a ton of power and better driveablity to be had in a properly set distributor,
Getting down to 102 is a lot and will cause worse idle problems.
Yea, i think as long as the mechanical's are not in play, the idle quality and drivability would still be good. Now, top end power would surely suffer some imo. But if low end is a priority........Why would it cause a worse idle?
It is what I have Experianced in the past.Why would it cause a worse idle?
But you'll find cracked always saying to move a cam that far.
Yeah, he does like his advance.........