Oldiron440
Big blocks rule small blocks drool!
Remember compression is torque and that 440 doesn’t have any.
getting slower just sitting on the stand !!!It sounds like the MH 440 is quickly becoming the underdog...
Like I said you could end up wasting a 440 block, those old 800+ gram pistons like to disintegrate.
Nick did a 440 more comp had a cam headers 750dp lost 20 hp when he put 440 manifolds on itNet is 195 hp, 320 ft lbs trq.
I'm guessing that would be about 260 hp / 390 gross ??
Just thinking out loud..... I could be way wrong. But this is my "mind math"
- It will have headers and 2.5" straight through muffler on the back. That's gotta be 40 hp (and a bunch more torque) on a 440 from the manifolds, single exhaust and catalytic converter... all in a small single pipe about 18 feet long LOL. When the heads were done, I did remove a little casting and a touch of bowl blending, but I consider it more of a "clean up" than porting. Might be another 10 there. I think I should be somewhere around 300-310 HP gross and maybe 425-450 ft lbs of torque?
![]()
getting slower just sitting on the stand !!!
I'll do everything I can to raise the faith in a RV 440![]()
I'm not. lolI am so confused.
Here it is apples to apples and the 440 runs away from a 5.9, not even close. lolGive the 440 what the 360 has. 9:1 compression with a closed chamber head with efficient ports proportional to the magnum heads. Good quench like a magnum and a hydraulic roller cam proportional to the reground Oregon cam in the 360 along with a dual plane rpm air gap like the 360 has and a similarly proportional carburetor like the 360 has . Or give the 360 what the 440 has. Pistons down in the hole, low compression, open chamber heads. And factory stock flat tappet camshaft with a stock cast iron intake
Who cares what Nick did, he's a hack. lolNick did a 440 more comp had a cam headers 750dp lost 20 hp when he put 440 manifolds on it
14.3
One thing I have noticed when tearing down magnum 360 engines is how well the cylinder walls hold up compared to the LA motors considering the mileage on them. I think it may have to do with them being fuel injected.I gotta be honest.... I've never seen a BB 440 crowd so intimidated by a 200,000 mile 360, with a little more cam. And, who said at 200,000 miles that the 360 has all the compression it should have from the factory?? Who knows what it has.... I don't. I can tell ya, I threw it in and ran 12.9's(oh, that was on a hot/humid day) I think in good air, that 12.91 might go down to a 12.79
What 440 and what 360 are you refering to? Are you looking at peak torque or average torque?lbs-ft per Cid tells the efficiency of the engine since the 440 makes similar torque as a decent 360 which to me now makes them similar engines that will need to turn similar rpm to make similar hp, but since the 440 is way less efficient it needs to move more air than the 360 to make similar power and rpm.
I ain't intimidated, I'm just playing along. lolI've never seen a BB 440 crowd so intimidated
The peak torque of the rv440 that have been dyno, making 465 ish lbs-ft at best a decent 360 can make similar.What 440 and what 360 are you refering to? Are you looking at peak torque or average torque?
Here it is apples to apples and the 440 runs away from a 5.9, not even close. lol
fixed it for yaRV440willrun....circles around the 5.9.
fixed it for ya
A 440 out of a rv makes 465 pk torque?The peak torque of the rv440 that have been dyno, making 465 ish lbs-ft at best a decent 360 can make similar.
I have yet to see any 360 carry torque through the rpm range like a decent 440, not even close.The peak torque of the rv440 that have been dyno, making 465 ish lbs-ft at best a decent 360 can make similar.
After cam intake and headers, like the one's that been posted so far.A 440 out of a rv makes 465 pk torque?
After cam intake and headers, like the one's that been posted so far.
This one does 444 lbs-ft and 338 hp
Not any one in particular.What 360 are you comparing this not stock 440 engine to?