Not me
Is it even possible to put a 265 on a 10 and be able to get the beads out that far? IDK
I run 295/50s on 10s but to get the treads flat to the road. I have to run down at 24psi.
Ima thinkin a 275/60 would like the 10s.
275/50s might stretch out that far, but I ran them on 8.5s
I use an 85% rule, namely that the rim size should be about 85% of the branded size.
With that in mind,
a 265 needs a 8.9
a 275 needs a 9.2
a 295 needs a 9.9
round up or down to the nearest available size.
When you do this, the tread will wear nicely.
the manufactures uses a 70% rule that establishes the branded size. In other words a 275 on a 70% rim, which is 7.6 inches, rounds to 7.5, will have a 275 profile, +/- 5mm. That means it can actually measure anywhere in between 270 and 280 on that 7.5 rim.
The 70% rule does not mean that a 7.5 rim will provide optimum tread life for a 275
In my experience the 7.5 is actually too narrow for a 275, and the edges of the tires curl up off the road, and the centers burn off long before the edges do. So I might as well have installed a smaller tire in the first place.
But the 85% rule has been working fine for me for decades.
But this means your 275 is no longer a 275.
When mounted on an 8.5, the sidewalls will be pushed out about 1/2 of the difference in rim sizes. So if the 70% rule dictates a 7.5; and the 85% rule dictates a 9.2, then the difference is 1.8, so the size will grow about .9 inch or 23mm. Adding the 23 to 275 gets you 298mm ...... which can still be +/- 5mm. So you could be looking at from 293 to 302mm.
This is important to know if you have a car with drop-down quarters like a Dart or Early-A.
As an example,
By the 70% rule, my 295s call for a rimsize of 8.13 rounds to 8inches, which would make them 295 +/-5mm
By the 85% rule, it calls for a 9.87rim, rounds to 10inches .
By the math , the section is predicted to grow .87 inch or 22mm, making it a 317 +/-5mm ,which is 312 to 322.
By actual measurement, mine came in at 12.75, or 324mm at 24 psi
Happy hunting