I just finished reading this issue of Mopar Muscle and can't help but wonder about all the small blocks being built and what it cost versus the horsepower and torque achieved. They've been building a 427ci stroker using a R3 block and all the "best" parts and spent a bunch to end up with a 500 hp engine. Indy Cylinder Head has a two page ad in the same issue offering several smaller stroker engines putting out more hp and torque for far less $. In the same issue is the recap of the Mopar engine builders results and nearly all of these "lesser" small blocks achieved more hp and torque than the 427. Now I know that some of the engine guys on this site would point out that the cam was wrong or the heads were wrong etc etc and they would be correct. My point is the magazine had Hughes and Shady Dell both involved in the build and I know that individually either company would have made more hp and torque had they been contracted to build the entire engine themselves instead of just furnishing components. Please tell me this isn't proof that engine building isn't always the sum of the whole. That is to say it's great to design an engine but if you have a specific goal that already been achieved by others I think it's kind of foolish to spend more to gain far less. All your thoughts? Sport