Not to sound bitter but if Robert needs a slip yolk and two cables in a small block case I'd say he's SOL. I certainly don't have one nor in 30+ years and I'd wager hundreds of combos I've had my eyes on have I ever seen one. I doubt the outputs can be swapped either - but I'd let a transmission guru validate that. Rather than me have to prove mines not what is being asked about, I'd suggest your yard buddy produce one Robert can buy.
As far as my stuff - I own a '65 Barracuda that I've had plans for years in any number of combos and I bought pretty much everything for all of them. I've settled on a 413 so some of the smaller engine stuff is going. The trans for sale is part of a '65 B-body powertrain I bought from the 2nd owner of it and has never been apart until I separated them a couple months ago when I sold the 273. Now its just in the way 'cause I'm out of shelf space on my transmissions shelves. It's identical in every detail to the '65 V8 904 I am keeping. That one I pulled from a '65 Barracuda with the 273 at a recycle yard. They were also correct to that car: Two cables, bolt on driveshaft flange. My '65 slanty car had the same deal. The '65 383/727 out of a B body I have IS two cables and a slip yolk, but it's a big block. I know of no small block cars in '65 with this combo that use a slip joint but I'm not professing to know everything about every Mopar made. Maybe trucks had something different? The one I'm advertising, and the slant 6 trans I'm also selling, and the V8 I'm keeping - are all identical in terms of control manner and outputs. I owned a '66 Barracuda before too. That had a slip yolk but was a 4sp so no clue if it's cable or linkage. My background tells me '66 auto was linkage actuated because the floor shifter uses rods just like the other mopar car models of that year do.
