Hang on...i have been around the internet.. if it's a 440 it has to do at least 500hp.. if not 600.... every old guy i know makes "around 500"I did one of these last winter on the dyno on a 440. It ran good when done and made a little more but nearly the same as a 750 ultra hp single carb.
View attachment 1716389622
It made 541 tq @ 3800 451hp @4900 using J607Hang on...i have been around the internet.. if it's a 440 it has to do at least 500hp.. if not 600.... every old guy i know makes "around 500"![]()
They never said which direction the phasing needed correction, which is still 'suspect' in My mind, but if the dizzy needed locked at say 10°BTDC(per Fitech)and the rotor needed moved an addtl. 8° to an advanced/retarded position.......I don't see why the entire spark curve couldn't have been shifted that 8° +/-, but then an outsider (like Nick) that may get this thing unaware of the deviation from the std. lock-out, & be confused making things worse trying to 'make it right'....OK.. i do have a phasing question for you guys... i understand a bit about rotor phasing from reading up as i'm bout to work on the curve on my motor... BUT... with that setup if the phasing was off, since it's fired by the fitech shouldn't they have been able to just adjust the signal delay in the fitech electronics? not need a special rotor?
very niceIt made 541 tq @ 3800 451hp @4900 using J607
AHH.. i saw the numbers on the left.. thought that was hp/tqIt made 541 tq @ 3800 451hp @4900 using J607
It almost sounds like they were reaching for any excuse, because they didn't know and needed a scapegoat. Like with the Hemi video. How many of us here would have KNOWN on the first try that the distributor was 180 degrees out? It was so evident it was pathetic, yet they just kept on grinding on the starter. Idiocy.They never said which direction the phasing needed correction, which is still 'suspect' in My mind, but if the dizzy needed locked at say 10°BTDC(per Fitech)and the rotor needed moved an addtl. 8° to an advanced/retarded position.......I don't see why the entire spark curve couldn't have been shifted that 8° +/-, but then an outsider (like Nick) that may get this thing unaware of the deviation from the std. lock-out, & be confused making things worse trying to 'make it right'....
I see. That's average HP. I think 3500 to 5500 rpm.AHH.. i saw the numbers on the left.. thought that was hp/tq
I don't think it was 180 out until he put 180 out thinking that it needed to be 180 out because they misinterpreted the video from MSD explaining to rotate the shaft 180 when locking it down. My head hurts just typing that.It almost sounds like they were reaching for any excuse, because they didn't know and needed a scapegoat. Like with the Hemi video. How many of us here would have KNOWN on the first try that the distributor was 180 degrees out? It was so evident it was pathetic, yet they just kept on grinding on the starter. Idiocy.
I don't think it was 180 out until he put 180 out thinking that it needed to be 180 out because they misinterpreted the video from MSD explaining to rotate the shaft 180 when locking it down. My head hurts just typing that.
I'm thinking that you can't modify the timing until after you get the signal from the pick up coil. Then you can only retard from there so the rotor is already past the terminal heading to the next cylinder. So the rotor would have to be related opposite the direction of rotation? There was multiple opportunities in that thought process to get things turned around but in the end I still have a 50/50 shot at getting it right.They never said which direction the phasing needed correction, which is still 'suspect' in My mind, but if the dizzy needed locked at say 10°BTDC(per Fitech)and the rotor needed moved an addtl. 8° to an advanced/retarded position.......I don't see why the entire spark curve couldn't have been shifted that 8° +/-, but then an outsider (like Nick) that may get this thing unaware of the deviation from the std. lock-out, & be confused making things worse trying to 'make it right'....
I used to watch him til is aw some stuff he does... then for awhile anything that's not OEM is ****.. then he went on a rant about how bad new cars are and i was out. I don't think he has any writers, just the camera guy as a partner or something... The fact they didn't read the directions then acted like it was all fitechs fault is hilarious thoughWell, all of these videos NOW are only for entertainment anyway. I liked Nick at first. But later on, you can sure tell he's doin what the writers and producers are tellin him. Caint blame him, really. I'm sure he'$ gettin paid.
Trust me. The show has writers.I used to watch him til is aw some stuff he does... then for awhile anything that's not OEM is ****.. then he went on a rant about how bad new cars are and i was out. I don't think he has any writers, just the camera guy as a partner or something... The fact they didn't read the directions then acted like it was all fitechs fault is hilarious though
ohh come on.. how? He's a tottering old man babbling **** at a camera... if he has writers.. uncle tony has writers.... "NO NO! The script says a 14x10 cinder block for decking a block! Not a 12x8!"Trust me. The show has writers.
Go to the part of the manual that talks about how to time it. It will tell you you don't have to allow the Fitec to control timing. I recommend if you aren't familiar with fitec to use that option first to get it running then change to fitec timing control if you desire.not optional..
yeah, i skimmed it, i think it said if you aren't using a locked out dist then the normal advance would handle the phasing.. BTW.. those fitech directions are some of the clearest i have seen... the TF2 directions might as well be crayon on a napkin at this pointGo to the part of the manual that talks about how to time it. It will tell you you don't have to allow the Fitec to control timing. I recommend if you aren't familiar with fitec to use that option first to get it running then change to fitec timing control if you desire.
The pcm is always altering the timing referenced to the preceeding cyl., if the target advance is 20° it will fire 70° after the preceeding pulse(V-8's), it can't 'get ahead' any other way. If You're using the system with a locked dizzy, You would map the entire curve advanced or retarded the amount of correction needed at the dizzy, it's that simple. It's not the right way to do it, but would work if the lack of parts/ability prevented re-phasing it correctly.I'm thinking that you can't modify the timing until after you get the signal from the pick up coil. Then you can only retard from there so the rotor is already past the terminal heading to the next cylinder. So the rotor would have to be related opposite the direction of rotation? There was multiple opportunities in that thought process to get things turned around but in the end I still have a 50/50 shot at getting it right.
Unless they use the cylinder before as reference for the next cylinder in which case it would need to be moved in the direction of rotation.
There, even if my logic is completely wrong I should have the answer covered both ways.
The program should have something like a "phase offset function" so you can get your phasing correct and numbers on the table to match the crankshaft degrees for cases where you can't use a msd distributor with adjustable rotor or don't want to use the distributor to control timing.The pcm is always altering the timing referenced to the preceeding cyl., if the target advance is 20° it will fire 70° after the preceeding pulse(V-8's), it can't 'get ahead' any other way. If You're using the system with a locked dizzy, You would map the entire curve advanced or retarded the amount of correction needed at the dizzy, it's that simple. It's not the right way to do it, but would work if the lack of parts/ability prevented re-phasing it correctly.
That would be a sensible feature, given all the possibilities for it to be incorrect, but what do I know....The program should have something like a "phase offset function" so you can get your phasing correct and numbers on the table to match the crankshaft degrees for cases where you can't use a msd distributor with adjustable rotor or don't want to use the distributor to control timing.