Brainstormin' 440 vs 5.9 ...

-
What we do know is some have found some pretty notable differences in the measurements from dyno to dyno. That doesn't happen with Wallace
What do you mean? Wallace isn't measuring horsepower it's calculating horse power under an exact set of perimeters. If your vehicle doesn't run the number how do you know if it is because the hp measured at the dyno is wrong or that you are not operating under the same perimeters that Wallace used to calculate how much power it should have? Or if it is some combination of both the dyno and the perimeters being off.
 
In my mind, if a engine dyno's 450 HP, and it's installed in a XXXX weight of car, and runs a MPH that shows 350 HP, I raise my eyebrows because a 100 hp loss is a lot. A LOT !!! Just say'n
Yet another scenario. Same motor, same car. Give the car to a novice drag racer and see what the et is. Now turn the car over to a championship winning team and driver and with no changes to the hp of the motor see how much the et is improved. How does the Wallace calculator account for that?
 
Another scenario. If you put the same motor that dynos *** hp in two different vehicles that weigh the same one is a pickup and one is a duster what is the chance that they both will run the same et?
I've actually taken track proven ET 340 and done the truck/duster deal. I can tell you, the truck was slower :)
 
Yet another scenario. Same motor, same car. Give the car to a novice drag racer and see what the et is. Now turn the car over to a championship winning team and driver and with no changes to the hp of the motor see how much the et is improved. How does the Wallace calculator account for that?
It's why I like to throw out the ET when using wallace. Easier to skewer the ET than the MPH
 
Does that mean the Wallace calculator is wrong?
The wind will affect the number a little (MPH). But not a 100 hp. And in the 1/8 mile the MPH would be even less of discrepancy
 

-
Back
Top Bottom