Carb size recommendation

-

Cuda 1964

FABO Gold Member
FABO Gold Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2020
Messages
178
Reaction score
140
Location
Onaway Michigan
Hi everyone
Looking for carb size recommendations I have a 318 .60 over 4in stroke trick flow 190 heads comp cam XE262-10 eddy air gap headers 2 1/2 exhaust 904 auto with a reworked converter 26in rear tires 3.23 gear posi rpm set at about 5500 in a 64 barracuda right now I have a 650 holley
Thanks in advance for your expertise knowledge
 

I've used vacuum secondary carburetors on many of my engines (from 318 to 440's) for almost 50 years. Tuned properly they are excellent performers and give respectable fuel economy. The secret to the performance of those carbs is to tune the secondary diaphram spring to bring the secondaries in without a bog. If you want to get the absolute best performance out of a setup for racing you should look into a double pumper like 318willrun suggested.
 
I've used vacuum secondary carburetors on many of my engines (from 318 to 440's) for almost 50 years. Tuned properly they are excellent performers and give respectable fuel economy. The secret to the performance of those carbs is to tune the secondary diaphram spring to bring the secondaries in without a bog. If you want to get the absolute best performance out of a setup for racing you should look into a double pumper like 318willrun suggested.
I do have a 650 HP holley right now was just wondering if a 750 might give me a little more performance or not
 
A 750 DP will feed it well enough, but a 397 stroker with TFS heads will respond well to any large 4150 style carburetor. Yes, a 750 will be worth more performance than a 650, but not as much as something in the 800 cfm and up range.
 
I’ve had a smaller Ford small block on the dyno and tested multiple different carbs from 600 dp to 850 dp making a total of eighteen pulls. The small displacement 292 inch W engine liked the 750 cfm the best making 8 hp and 4 tq more than the 650 dp. This engine has a max power at 6200 if that makes any difference but I would think with more displacement the gain could be more.
 
-
Back
Top Bottom