Every day economy build

-
The hydraulic lifter head is different. It takes a different valve cover. But the short block is easily converted by using a earlier solid lifter head. Just asking, but what's the fascination with the later engine?
 
The hydraulic lifter head is different. It takes a different valve cover. But the short block is easily converted by using a earlier solid lifter head. Just asking, but what's the fascination with the later engine?

Sounded like weight. The difference in weight will likely not make a noticeable difference. I would just rebuild the original early slant.
 
The hydraulic lifter head is different. It takes a different valve cover. But the short block is easily converted by using a earlier solid lifter head. Just asking, but what's the fascination with the later engine?
Its a lighter block and rotating assembly isn't it? Do I need to do any modifications to the block for solid lifter? In your first post you talked through the oiling for hydraulic lifters, do any of those galleries need to be blocked off?
 
Sounded like weight. The difference in weight will likely not make a noticeable difference. I would just rebuild the original early slant.
I guess I'll need to pull it out and check it out before I make a final decision, if they are close and it really doesn't make as much of a difference as I thought it would, I'll rebuild the original motor
 

Its a lighter block and rotating assembly isn't it? Do I need to do any modifications to the block for solid lifter? In your first post you talked through the oiling for hydraulic lifters, do any of those galleries need to be blocked off?
No, the two engines oil the same. Boy, that's really splittin some hairs saying one is lighter than the other. I don't believe there's 20 pounds difference between them.
 
I guess I'll need to pull it out and check it out before I make a final decision, if they are close and it really doesn't make as much of a difference as I thought it would, I'll rebuild the original motor
I think that's a sound decision.
 
Is this a 904 auto? We have forgot to mention that the torque converter nose bushing is different size between early 225s and later. I forget which is bigger but you may have to either have a custom torque converter made or add a bushing to the crankshaft depending on which one is bigger. Another reason to just use what you know works in the car.
 
Is this a 904 auto? We have forgot to mention that the torque converter nose bushing is different size between early 225s and later. I forget which is bigger but you may have to either have a custom torque converter made or add a bushing to the crankshaft depending on which one is bigger. Another reason to just use what you know works in the car.
67 and back has the small crank register, 68 and forward has the large one.
 
Is this a 904 auto? We have forgot to mention that the torque converter nose bushing is different size between early 225s and later. I forget which is bigger but you may have to either have a custom torque converter made or add a bushing to the crankshaft depending on which one is bigger. Another reason to just use what you know works in the car
Hadn't even considered that, it's the push button transmission, which I believe is the 904 like you said.
 
Well I have a scale and both engines! So give me a week or so, and I'll post some specs!
I believe you will find the biggest difference between the crankshafts. But by all means, please report back on that. I'd love to see some real numbers.
 
Does anyone offer that bushing to go from the smaller early TC to the larger crank opening anymore?
 
could you not machine a bushing? if I'm thinking of the right thing, it's just the pilot bearing in the crank correct?
Not exactly. The pilot bushings are all the same. What we're talking about fits into the larger crankshaft register that the torque converter hub fits into. You put the bushing into the 68 and later crank register so that the 67 and earlier converter hub will fit into the register correctly.
 
-
Back
Top Bottom