New Mancini Timing Cover Fitment Issue

-
I would just eliminate that seal and use silicone to seal it.

Some of the most expensive oil pans I’ve bought don’t use those end seals.

I run a crank scraper so I don’t even use pan gaskets. It doesn’t leak but I can’t remember if I use end seals or not.

Either way I wouldn’t care about using the end seal.
 
You sure you don’t have the rear pan seal for a 360? 318 and 340 have the the same size front and rear but the 360 is the same as the 318 in the front but the rear seal is smaller. Any way your seal is the wrong one.
 
Assuming the 1832 is 183.2mm and the 2153 is 215.3mm, that would be 7.21" and 8.48" respectively. That is a 1.27" difference on just that one measurement. I would get a refund from Mancini and buy a good used one.
 
Assuming the 1832 is 183.2mm and the 2153 is 215.3mm, that would be 7.21" and 8.48" respectively. That is a 1.27" difference on just that one measurement. I would get a refund from Mancini and buy a good used one.
I'm thinking it wasn't zeroed out. Look closely at the scale. The Mancini one looks to be close to 150mm, whereas the original looks to be maybe 146mm. Not sure what's up with the LCD display.

1715569040141.png
 
Why not use a billet cover that has o-rings for seals?

I thought the SB version was NLA?

I personally love to use that. Several members and myself asked if you are going to make it again. So are u?

I asked you a couple years ago about that cover. No longer available. If it’s available again I’ll buy one right now.

That makes two of us

If I knew a Milodon gear drive will fit under it I’d buy one.


That's a lot of interest Andy. Is there any interest on your end to doing a group buy? Everyone who's interested pays some (or all) up front?
 
-
Back
Top