How is 'engine efficiency' defined in the statement? Uses 20% less fuel? Makes 20% more HP? Both?
I do believe there is extra HP to be made from ign systems, but not double digit.
"Across the drive cycle, that is a really good engine. And what we were able to do was drop [the plasma ignition system] on, put a slightly different spark plug in the hole but still a spark plug and then our power supply, and they were able to get up to 6 percent increase in fuel economy. This, with the stock engine pulled out of a crashed car, with just being able to open up that EGR valve a bit more and adjust the timing, and then we were able to get that benefit," he said.
"Essentially, if you were to open the EGR valve more with the stock ignition system, you would start to lose combustion efficiency and so you no longer get the overall benefit. Whereas with us they were able to open up that valve more and preserve the combustion efficiency and, therefore, that translates into better fuel economy because you have a lower temperature of combustion. You're reducing heat losses," Singleton told Ars.
6% ain't nothing, but it's also not 20%. I think they're extrapolating to where they think the tech could go.
Sounds like they're using higher temperature and more energetic ignition for super lean mixtures and they're leaning it with egr, mostly to reduce heat loss.
There's lots of ways to reduce heat loss and with the increase in hybrid drive systems I could see power recovery generators doing more good from waste heat than this. Especially since starting and stopping is where the highest specific consumption happens. For fleet vehicles, this type of igniton might help some, but somehow I doubt it's going to become mainstream.