/6 Matt
30 Degrees Crooked
Get ready for the rant of a lifetime....:angryfir:
I have a set of 14" steelies I bought from barracudakid a coulple months ago that I've been searching for someone to sandblast. Well I finally found somebody so the only thing I needed to do was have the tires removed. I got finished with some work on the car today and figured well I'm not doing anything so I'll see if I can find a tire shop that's open on saturdays. I call around and find tire kingdom is open till 7 so I go there.
There was one car in a bay when I got there. One guy was working and 6 were standing around, smoking, eating pizza and walking around aimlessly. I understand lunch break, but not everybody goes at the same time dammit!
I sat for an hour waiting for them to do a a job that literally took them 5 minutes and I probably smoked a whole pack of cigs while waiting.
At some point, some guy pulls up while I was still waiting and he gets pulled right in and the put the car on the lift and next thing ya know, there's like 6 guys standing under the car looking at the underside of it!!! WTF MAN!!! :mumum: IT DOES NOT TAKE THAT MANY GUYS TO STARE AT THE UNDERSIDE OF A CAR LIKE A BUNCH OF CHICKENS WATCHING RAIN!!!!
So they finally get my $h%t done and then I'm standing inside waiting to pay (which took another 20 minutes of waiting) and this lady comes in and says something about how the new tires were put on the back of her car and her husband says since its FWD they should be on the front (I guess for mud snow and ice?) and the guy at the counter (who is in his 30's)says "well we do that because industry standard suggests we should because when you're braking the front of the car dips down and essentially the rear of the car lifts.
I couldn't take it......... I called BS.
I told them all that was the biggest load of BS I've heard all day and continued to state that the real reason is due to hydro plaining in corners. I laid it out like this: If two tires, one old with half tread and one new with full tread, hit the same patch of water, the old half tread tire is more out to hydro plane or skid. New tires in the rear means the front tires will hydroplane first causing and understeer condition in which the car wants to travel in a straight line which most drivers will have an easier time controlling. New tires in the front cause the back to hydroplane and cause oversteer or in laymans terms, drifting, which I personally would prefer anyways.
I continued to state that the only reason I could see his theory being true is that older tires tend to dry out and have a harder compound resulting in less traction. So in braking, when the rear of the car lifts the newer tire will have less chance of loosing traction than the newer tire BUT the industry standard is called the industry standard for a reason. Industry standard says not many people drive older vehicles without anti-lock brakes and therefore the industry standard states that most drivers have anti-lock brakes making his theory null and void! :finga:
I continued to tell that guy to go let all his buddies know he just got schooled by a 19 year old :finga: and to get his manager and let him know exactly why I was disspleased with my service (and buddy I let him know) and that I'd like to pay for my $h%t and get the hell out of there and get the F#$k on with my life!
OK, rant over. I feel better.
PS, yes my language was THAT colorful. And all of the other two customer in there got to hear the whole thing as I made an *** out of myself in public.
I have a set of 14" steelies I bought from barracudakid a coulple months ago that I've been searching for someone to sandblast. Well I finally found somebody so the only thing I needed to do was have the tires removed. I got finished with some work on the car today and figured well I'm not doing anything so I'll see if I can find a tire shop that's open on saturdays. I call around and find tire kingdom is open till 7 so I go there.
There was one car in a bay when I got there. One guy was working and 6 were standing around, smoking, eating pizza and walking around aimlessly. I understand lunch break, but not everybody goes at the same time dammit!
I sat for an hour waiting for them to do a a job that literally took them 5 minutes and I probably smoked a whole pack of cigs while waiting.
At some point, some guy pulls up while I was still waiting and he gets pulled right in and the put the car on the lift and next thing ya know, there's like 6 guys standing under the car looking at the underside of it!!! WTF MAN!!! :mumum: IT DOES NOT TAKE THAT MANY GUYS TO STARE AT THE UNDERSIDE OF A CAR LIKE A BUNCH OF CHICKENS WATCHING RAIN!!!!
So they finally get my $h%t done and then I'm standing inside waiting to pay (which took another 20 minutes of waiting) and this lady comes in and says something about how the new tires were put on the back of her car and her husband says since its FWD they should be on the front (I guess for mud snow and ice?) and the guy at the counter (who is in his 30's)says "well we do that because industry standard suggests we should because when you're braking the front of the car dips down and essentially the rear of the car lifts.
I couldn't take it......... I called BS.
I told them all that was the biggest load of BS I've heard all day and continued to state that the real reason is due to hydro plaining in corners. I laid it out like this: If two tires, one old with half tread and one new with full tread, hit the same patch of water, the old half tread tire is more out to hydro plane or skid. New tires in the rear means the front tires will hydroplane first causing and understeer condition in which the car wants to travel in a straight line which most drivers will have an easier time controlling. New tires in the front cause the back to hydroplane and cause oversteer or in laymans terms, drifting, which I personally would prefer anyways.
I continued to state that the only reason I could see his theory being true is that older tires tend to dry out and have a harder compound resulting in less traction. So in braking, when the rear of the car lifts the newer tire will have less chance of loosing traction than the newer tire BUT the industry standard is called the industry standard for a reason. Industry standard says not many people drive older vehicles without anti-lock brakes and therefore the industry standard states that most drivers have anti-lock brakes making his theory null and void! :finga:
I continued to tell that guy to go let all his buddies know he just got schooled by a 19 year old :finga: and to get his manager and let him know exactly why I was disspleased with my service (and buddy I let him know) and that I'd like to pay for my $h%t and get the hell out of there and get the F#$k on with my life!
OK, rant over. I feel better.
PS, yes my language was THAT colorful. And all of the other two customer in there got to hear the whole thing as I made an *** out of myself in public.