I’ve gone & gotten myself confused.
Looking at another thread, someone’s talking about symmetrical bolt circles, yet that doesn’t seem to be what I have. Somewhere I read that all 318 and 5.2 are internally balanced. Looking at rock auto, 96 and newer flexplate really doesn’t mention weighting, but 95 specifically says w/o weight.
I ordered and internally balanced crank for a 5.9, connecting it to a 42 RH from a 88 3.9 Dakota with a slotted pump drive.
I believe I’m correct that I need to get a neutral balance converter with a slotted drive.
I would also need a neutral balance flexplate with 10 inch bolt spacing. But I’m reading also that they changed the bolt pattern so early and late wouldn’t get mixed up.
Sorry this is so long
Would I just get a neutral balance converter with a 10 inch bolt pattern,
And a flex plate for a ?? year 5.2, and if the converter bolt holes don’t lineup, just weld up the one that doesn’t match and re-drill it
5.2 and 5.9 crank bolt patterns are the same for all years correct?
Looking at another thread, someone’s talking about symmetrical bolt circles, yet that doesn’t seem to be what I have. Somewhere I read that all 318 and 5.2 are internally balanced. Looking at rock auto, 96 and newer flexplate really doesn’t mention weighting, but 95 specifically says w/o weight.
I ordered and internally balanced crank for a 5.9, connecting it to a 42 RH from a 88 3.9 Dakota with a slotted pump drive.
I believe I’m correct that I need to get a neutral balance converter with a slotted drive.
I would also need a neutral balance flexplate with 10 inch bolt spacing. But I’m reading also that they changed the bolt pattern so early and late wouldn’t get mixed up.
Sorry this is so long
Would I just get a neutral balance converter with a 10 inch bolt pattern,
And a flex plate for a ?? year 5.2, and if the converter bolt holes don’t lineup, just weld up the one that doesn’t match and re-drill it
5.2 and 5.9 crank bolt patterns are the same for all years correct?















