Hopefully you have a newer Torker II as opposed to the original Torker 340. The originals are not a good intake. But a dual plane should be the best style for a mild combo as well as a broad range of built engines.
Myron, the TorkerII 340 sucks worse than he original.....by a pretty fair margin. At least that;s been my direct experience and there have been many rag articles that back it up. Neither is great but the TorkerII sucks dried up dead mouse infested camel ballsacks.
Now maybe for nitrous, the TorkerII might shine a little.
Least ways, that's been my experience.
Anybody have proof that the 71 intake is the best? Just curious. I have heard it from day one, its the only reason I built a 71 duster. But is there documented dyno tests out there?
The Holley Strip Dom and MoPar M1 are really great in the performance range. As there intended for. For ha ha's, I want to try a TQ up top of one.
I have a 73 340 OEM manifold, no EGR, 72 cast date that I removed due to intake leak and swapped in an Eddy Performer that was sitting on the shelf. I think I lost a little top end doing the swap. I run a larger 71 TQ off a 440. I bolted on a Holley 750 VS 3310C and went back to the TQ. Both carbs are dialed in to 12.3 AFR at WOT and the TQ pulls harder hands down.
Well, looks like somebody sniped the Action Plus Fred offered me after seeing it on this thread. Just when I was trying to close the deal. Damn. Backbiters....