That wasn't the point, the tire diameter will effect the final gear ratio.
heavy truck, factory stall and higher effective final gear ratio would factor in on which cam to choose.
4.10s with 33s will feel like
4.10 x 26.5/33= 3.29s with 26.5s
That's a reduction to 3.29/4.10= 80%, looked at another way, your stroker could feel like .8 x 416=334 cubes, running a 3.29 rear cog. This is an oversimplification, that does not take into account the inherent torque increase of the stroker, but you get the idea, which is; It ain't gonna be pretty.
But, you know, some guys will argue that the stroker will make up the difference.
With 33s and 4.10s, the math says 65= 2715rpm@ zero-slip, in Top gear; Maybe 2800@3% slip. Pushing a wind maybe up to 2850@5% slip.
The thing is this;
with 4.10s, 5500 is 49 mph in First at 10% slip, 86mph at 6% slip in Second. But 60mph in Second at WOT might be just 4000 in Second.
So, while Rusty likes the 270* cam, and it is a good choice, at 60mph in Second,
you are barely on the bottom of the power curve, and 26mph to go to the peak. So forget passing in a hurry at @ 55/60, for one.
Furthermore, taking off with gears that feel like 3.29s, even the stroker is gonna want some stall, in a W-200.
IMO
I think you need to rethink where you want the power to be; those 4.10s and 33s, might cramp you a bit.
------------------------
If it was me, I think I would like passing power cuz I don't like to be stuck behind a slow-poke that can't keep a steady speed for long periods of time. But here in Manitoba, most of our roads are just one-lane each way with usually graveled shoulders, so when I pull out, it's "hammer-time".
So to that thought, I'd be regearing it and/or bringing the power down to a lower roadspeed/rpm. Since our speed limits here are mostly 65, I'd be thinking of a 70 mph 2-3 shift speed, at WOT.
With 4.10s and 33s; 70 in Second gear, at WOT and 10% slip, is about 4660. So the power peak could be about 300rpm sooner or say 4400. That would get you into a 204@.050cam, (with a SBM), maybe a 212* with the stroker, so advertised might be around 256*. That will also give you some bottom end torque to pull that 3.29Effective gear, without a hi-stall. This takes us to;
Personally, I'd not use a 224* @ 050, even with a 408, for the purpose you want it to perform. I doubt you have anything close to racing in mind. I'd keep the lift around .450, the duration @ 050 around 212, and around a 112 LSA. You want bottom end grunt.
But I like that 270Cam, with about 224@.050, which might peak at 5000, and could be shifted at 5300. So as for me, I might regear it instead.
That 224 will make a chitload of torque with a stroker, but to synchronize the power to passing, you would need 4.88s for a shift speed of 68mph@5400 in Second at WOT.
>At 55 then, at WOT in Second, the rpm will be about 4400; well up the power curve, and this will climb to 5400@68mph; obviously a very nice passing gear. But;
>65=3230@zero slip, perhaps 3360 on the tach at 4% slip.
>The Chrysler overdrive with loc-up would bring that down to 2230, about perfect for fuel-economy with that 224* cam.
--------------------
My 92 Dakota(5.2M) had a 4x4 overdrive, but I can't say if it was a 904, or a 727 based trans. I ran it with 3.91s and 28s for 65=2100 in od and locked up. Very Sweet.....