The examples he give shows mid torque gains with going with a tighter lsa but was that really even in question ?
But to me the gains aren't large enough to say it proves DV's formula, if anything it disproves it cause to me for the formula to be valid being a few degrees off of calculated lsa in either direction should have huge losses, I'd like to see engines that the formula predicts wider lsa like 114-116 + and run 108 lsa and less against them and see if there's loses or gains, would be a better tests.
But to me the gains aren't large enough to say it proves DV's formula, if anything it disproves it cause to me for the formula to be valid being a few degrees off of calculated lsa in either direction should have huge losses, I'd like to see engines that the formula predicts wider lsa like 114-116 + and run 108 lsa and less against them and see if there's loses or gains, would be a better tests.