I've read of how google leverages small pages to conform to their policies. They even have a clause in the form that you sign to receive revenue from their advertising that holds the page owner responsible for the acts of others outside of the confines of the page.
Say your readers discover that clicking on links in or out of your page causes more money to flow into the page coffers and they do that with no intent of buying those products, but simply to benefit your page. Google will deduct what ever they see fit if they think this is happening with or without your knowledge!
BBC.com had an article on this a while back. One page owner decided that their intrusiveness was not worth the price and scaled back the page after evicting google ads. Another simply shut down and google was trying to recover previous funds paid to that former owner.
I think that Orwell missed. It isn't just big gumberment that we should be wary of. It's big internet business' too! Don't get me started on Amazon...
Say your readers discover that clicking on links in or out of your page causes more money to flow into the page coffers and they do that with no intent of buying those products, but simply to benefit your page. Google will deduct what ever they see fit if they think this is happening with or without your knowledge!
BBC.com had an article on this a while back. One page owner decided that their intrusiveness was not worth the price and scaled back the page after evicting google ads. Another simply shut down and google was trying to recover previous funds paid to that former owner.
I think that Orwell missed. It isn't just big gumberment that we should be wary of. It's big internet business' too! Don't get me started on Amazon...















