Low speed torque and driveability ?

-
Cruising around town 1400 -1600 is where i noticed throttle response was lazy.
Compare the 256 with the 268. and the 256 wouldn't make as much torque as a stock cam below 2000. The graph
doesn't show the diifference below that but it is even greater. I did have a stock 340 with the generic replacement
Melling 340 cam at .204 / .214 duration. That thing would pin you in your bucket seat at any low rpm and would break
the tires loose at low speeds as well. 3.23:1 gears

xe268.JPG


xe256.JPG
 
Cruising around town 1400 -1600 is where i noticed throttle response was lazy.
How do you know it's cause of torque and not say something like overlap ?
Compare the 256 with the 268. and the 256 wouldn't make as much torque as a stock cam below 2000.
I don't know about that, possibly

I doubt the 256 would give up much it's got slightly more @ fifty duration, less advertised, similar lift, on a 110 lsa which should give better low end torque than 340's lsa.

But yes we don't have any dyno evidence down under 2000 rpm so it's a bit of guess work.
The graph
To me don't look like these much difference down low
doesn't show the diifference below that but it is even greater. I did have a stock 340 with the generic replacement
Melling 340 cam at .204 / .214 duration. That thing would pin you in your bucket seat at any low rpm and would break
the tires loose at low speeds as well. 3.23:1 gears
How much torque do you need at 1500-2000 rpm before it's. Not lazy ?

Say there's an amount eg. 300 lbs-ft does that mean a large displacement engine can never be lazy no matter the size the cam ?

Sure it's not the overlap the engine is not like running there?

How long does your car spend under 2000 rpm at full throttle ?
RPM Operating Range:1,000-5,200
Grind Number:XE256H
Cam Type:Hydraulic Flat Tappet
Lifter Style:Hydraulic Flat Tappet
Camshaft Series:Xtreme Energy
Usage:Street/Performance
California Proposition 65:WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm P65Warnings.ca.gov
Advertised Intake Duration:256
Advertised Exhaust Duration:268
Intake Duration at .050 Inch Lift:212
Exhaust Duration at .050 Inch Lift:218
Intake Valve Lift:0.447
Exhaust Valve Lift:0.455
Lobe Separation:110


If you look at this 360, @ 2500 the stock 2bbl cam makes about 330 lbs-ft and the xe256h & xe268h makes about 380 & 370 lbs-ft respectively a good 40-50 lbs-ft over stock cam, at 2000 rpm the stock 2bbl cam is still about 330 lbs-ft, the other aren't dyno'd down there so it's a guess but the dyno graph you provided didn't drop off there so I'd it safe to guess there still a positive gain possibly not.

I could be wrong and it's all about the torque especially since we got to guesstimate and piece together what's happening down there but I not seeing any overwhelming evidence saying so.

Graph starts at 9:45
 
Stock 2bbl with headers vs 4bbl headers and xe262h

TORQUE SUPERFLOW 901 DYNO-TESTED AT WESTECH
RPMBASEMOD 1MOD 2
2,000292
2,500287
3,000287338336
3,500272335340
4,000248326330
4500218309319
5,000188285296
5,500250258
 
Magnum stock cam vs mild 265 hydraulic roller
Both about 400 lbs-ft at 3000 rpm

 
477 hp 318

RPMTQHP
2,500337161
2,600350173
2,700357183
2,800357190
2,900356196
3,000351201
3,100345204
3,200339207
3,300343216
3,400356230
3,500371247
3,600385264
3,700396279
3,800404292
3,900410305
4,000415316
4,100418327
4,200420336
4,300422345
4,400421353
4,500420360
4,600421369
4,700425380
4,800426390
4,900427398
5,000427407
5,100427414
5,200426421
5,300425428
5,400423435
5,500421440
5,600419446
5,700417453
5,800415458
5,900412462
6,000407465
6,100401466
6,200397469
6,300393471
6,400390475
6,500386477
 
If you look at all the 318 builds there all making 332-356 lbs-ft at 3000 rpm more than the stock dyno numbers on these graph for the 318 and a small margin for the 340 and 360. With comps xe262, xe268, xe275, 280 and fairly big solid roller in the 477 hp 318 making 337 lbs-ft at 2500 rpm which is still higher than stock 340, and would assume this should be the lazest one at low rpms ?

Unless all these engines take a super massive nose dive under 2500 rpms which I highly doubt for most of them.
 
360 stock 2bbl to 4bbl headers and xe262h

Torque
RPM123456
2000357.3376.9346.7356.8349.6
2200350.7370.9347.9351.3345.8
2400349.8367.5355.9353.1350.4
2600351.5367.1359.5352.6361.0353.8
2800358.8374.1367.1357.7359.7361.0
3000370.1388.0373.6363.2364.1371.9
3100371.7390.6375.9366.0369.3375.6
3200371.2390.7376.0368.7375.7381.6
3300371.3390.3377.1368.8381.0389.6
3400367.8388.9374.1368.7386.3396.1
3600361.2381.7369.2367.0390.8400.1
3700357.7375.0367.1363.3391.8400.6
3800349.9370.4363.6358.7386.9398.0
4000342.8357.8354.9348.3380.3394.0
4200331.0346.3344.9337.6383.1389.5
4400316.4329.1329.0325.1378.1385.5
4600295.7311.0313.3310.5368.2375.6
4800286.5293.8299.8290.7355.1363.3
5000270.9278.7282.0272.4342.7351.9
5200330.3337.8
5400311.8321.7
 
Stock 273 Commando

Only about 280 lbs-ft at peak

1712591839655.png
 
I'd say it's a case of piss poor carb parts selection and tuning.
100% right
ive run all those cams including the 471 street hemi and the 484
the xe268 is stronger then the stock 340 cam across the board if the car is tuned right
having it in the 68 340 with nothing more then a stealth and a tuned 650 dp its nit even close
85k all stock 14.3 @97 mph
100k bottom end now new top end 268 same intake carb much much quicker and faster its not close
Tune the setup instead of blame the cam
that includes timming
 
Basically the 380hp crate engine



On The Dyno5.9LMagnum
RPM:TQ:HP:
3,000407233
3,100406240
3,200406248
3,300409257
3,400411266
3,500413275
3,600414284
3,700415293
3,800416301
3,900416309
4,000417318
4,100419327
4,200420336
4,300419343
4,400419351
4,500419359
4,600418366
4,700416373
4,800413378
4,900409382
5,000405386
5,100401390
5,200397393
5,300392396
5,400387398
5,500381399
5,600375400
5,700367399
5,800361399
5,900354397
6,000347396
 
Mopar Performance 360 cid 380 hp rated

RPMTQHP
2500380.6181
3000402.9230
3500415.1277
4000437.8333
4100439.5343
4500437.1375
5000416.3396
5400398.6409
5500388.6407
6000343.9395
 
My 71 Dart is a turd until a minimum 1500 RPM. Stock 340 and 3.23 rear gears. But I think my converter stalls at less than 2000 RPM so the converter is the first thing to address. Gears will stay due to the amount of highway miles it sees.
 
360 build

Dyno Test
HorsepowerTorque
RPMTest 1Test 2Test 3RPMTest 1Test 2Test 3
2600172.7N/A166.12600348.9N/A335.6
2800190.6196.6183.92800357.7365.8245.1
3000204.3207.51973000357.7363.3345
3200190.1226216.23200359.6370.7354.9
3400237.6242.4235.33400367374.5363.5
3600258.3267.7253.13600376.8390.6369.3
3800281.4281.8274.93800388.9389.4379.9
4000299.6310.1297.14000393.5407.2390
4200319.1313.8314.44200399.1392.3393
4400320.8329.4328.54400383.8393.1392
4600354.5352.73524600404.8402.7401.6
4800359.5379.4375.44700397.2420.2408.4
5000377.4392.3389.44800393.4415.2410.7
5200378.8396.5401.64900399.8410.6412.2
5400390.3401411.75000396.4412409.1
5600384399.14205200382.6400.4405.7
5800387392.3426.55400379.5390400.5
6000369.2391.8430.25600360.2374.3394
6200370.2377423.35800350.5355.3386.1
 
Last edited:
473 hp EQ headed 273

Only makes 255 lbs-ft @ 3500 rpm and looks like it peaks at 330 lbs-ft @ 4800 rpm

1712592588540.png

1712592615281.png
 
A 655 hp 242/248 @ 0.050" solid roller 446

431-448 lbs-ft at 2500 rpm how big of a cam, how much torque you'd have to lose to have a lazy 446?

DYNO RESULTS
SUPERFLOW 902 ENGINE DYNO
STP CORRECTION
TESTED AT WESTECH
446 RB MOPAR
HORSEPOWER
RPMT1T2T3
2,500213213205
3,000291288268
3,500361360342
4,000422420412
4,500481484484
5,000534538548
5,500586590605
6,000617626641
6,300632640655
6,500625635647
TORQUE
RPMT1T2T3
2,500448448431
3,000510504467
3,500542540513
4,000554552541
4,500561565565
5,000561565575
5,300565568577
5,500560564577
6,000540548561
6,500506512523
LegendT1. Indy two-plane intakeT2. Indy two-plane intake with a Wilson 1-inch tapered spacerT3. Indy single-plane intake
 
My 71 Dart is a turd until a minimum 1500 RPM. Stock 340 and 3.23 rear gears. But I think my converter stalls at less than 2000 RPM so the converter is the first thing to address. Gears will stay due to the amount of highway miles it sees.
Stock 340 verter stalls over 2k
anything under 2k doesnt even matter
tune the setup
my 340 268 650 dp 3.23s dead stop punch from 850 rpm smokes the tires instantly tach jumps to 5500 stays there then 15 feet on the 1 to 2 shift at 50ish mph if i so choose
now 3.91s will smoke 1st and 2nd 5800 rpm if i want
 
Aren't all these posted torque charts run at WOT? To me, drivability means nice/smooth bottom end acceleration with the least amount of throttle opening.

I'm still sticking with my ''big inch/long arm theory.....:)
 
Stock 340 verter stalls over 2k
anything under 2k doesnt even matter
tune the setup
my 340 268 650 dp dead stop punch from 850 rpm smokes the tires instantly tach jumps to 5500 stays there then 15 feet on the 1 to 2 shift at 50ish mph if i so choose
That's what I'm wondering, there decent dyno evidence that at least to 2500 rpm most these engines should be ok torque wise, so 1,500-2,000/2500 rpms maybe in question. Even with a stock stall realistically how long your spending under 2500/3000 rpms a fraction of a second maybe 1-2 at most during a full throttle run, even when you pass or merge car should drop down a gear be at 2500/3000 rpms.
 
I agree, it's the duration. As OldRick suggests, strong acceleration from lower speeds...even at part throttle.
 
Aren't all these posted torque charts run at WOT? To me, drivability means nice/smooth bottom end acceleration with the least amount of throttle opening.

I'm still sticking with my ''big inch/long arm theory.....:)
What I'm getting at more say stock cammed 2bbl 360 makes 330 tq @ 2500 rpm with 4bbl headers makes 373 tq @ 2500 rpm add a xe256 & xe268 and still makes around 375 tq say a xe275h drops down to 350 tq @ 2500 rpm, an xe285h say 325 tq @ 2500 rpm why is the 275 and 285 and maybe the 268 will usually be considered less drive friendly and stated cause will be considered the loss of torque.

Now you could say well we don't know what's happening torque wise idle-2000/2500 rpm which is basically true. But generally like you said we'd be at part throttle at those rpms to do normal driving and the engine will only be making a fraction of the available power it will be making what's needed which even a /6 is capable of doing unless when you drive a /6 it's floored the whole time. So even if you loss torque down here you generally wouldn't be using it anyways.

I'm just saying that the so called driveability might be other things than just torque.
 
I agree, it's the duration. As OldRick suggests, strong acceleration from lower speeds...even at part throttle.

The whole thing I'm getting at is torque the main/whole culprit ? As most would say or is there other factors that play a huge or bigger role ?

Obviously what we consider driveability and what part of driving has a huge effect, cruising, passing, spirted driving, from stop to full throttle and cruising to full throttle are all different in what were exactly comparing.

Like you said earlier you find a xe268h cam a dog compared to stock 340 cam, your saying cause of loss of torque, I'm saying maybe, maybe part of it but I don't think so, all those dyno's I posted low end torque don't seem to be an issue, but were generally not seeing under 2000-3000 rpms so hard to say for sure, but if there is an issue I'd say it's probably other things which I was hoping to get to the bottom of.

If it is mainly a lack of torque that would be fine I just don't see how.

P.S. Aj say 340 cams have terrible bottom end :)


An engine needs very little hp most of the time.

At 1313 rpm hp is 25% of torque.

Tq. hp.
100 = 25
200 = 50
250 = 63
275 = 69
300 = 75
325 = 81
350 = 88

At 2626 rpm an engine need half the torque to make those hp numbers.
 
What do you mean anything under 2000 rpm doesn’t matter? If the stock stall was around 2400 rpm and mine stalls around 1800 rpm that’s a problem.
no its not a 340 tuned right smokes the tires at 1800 not just spin smoke if not
somethings wrong with tune not the verter or cam
 
-
Back
Top