MileHighDart
Well-Known Member
Not for me, the blacked out look is so yesterday.
& tiny *****
They don't seem to care what it costs, just what the monthly payment is. .
Jus' shows ya we didn't learn a damn thing in the big crash of either 28 or '08[/Q
x2
New trucks come with a tiny ***** now??? I have to admit I've been out of the loop for awhile, but WOW!!!
I have one of those Blacktop cars. I bought it back in October/November. I have only seen two others in my area. One black one, and a red one. I love the look of it. And that is where it matters. If you don't like them, don't buy them. But to degrade someone because of their choice in car ( unless it's a Honda with a fart can muffler, that is ) is unworthy of any of us here.
To the OP:
What I want to see, and have wanted to see this for a while now, is a mid sized, and compact coupe with a high power motor, and manual transmission. Maybe even AWD. I think the Dart would be incredible as a R/AWD, 2dr with either the 3.6 Pentastar, or the 5.7 Hemi. Yet, where do they go, discontinue the Avenger to focus on ONE midsized sedan. NO new mid sized sedan for Dodge, and no mid sized coupe. I would sell my 200, and my Avenger for a mid sized two door RWD with a V6/V8 and a manual. Did you know that the Avenger wasn't available a manual? How do you have a performance car with no manual? Pathetic IMHO. Back in the day, I could get a Turbo Daytona with a manual... THAT was a fun car...
/Rant!
My car:
RustyRR It is quite clear to me that you have not driven a 6.4L SRT8 Challenger...It may be heavier then the Camaro and the Mustang but with a top speed in all three of over 175MPH I want something with some weight to it...The Challenger is also the most comfortable to drive of the three....I am not calling you out just my opinion and its like an *** everyone has one and some stink...I personally like all three and if I were loaded I would own all three each one has its good and bad points...Bill:burnout::burnout::burnout:
I'm not a fan of 40k trucks...
...I wish they would come out with version that's like a Furd Raptor....
The article was in Muscle Car review and they ran all 3 for 1.5 miles in the Mojave Desert...BUT the Mustang was 668 Hp the Camaro was 558 Hp and the Challenger was 495 Hp..So HOW is any of the stats even fair comparing majorly different cars and engines....Just saying if you are going to compare.. Compare apples to apples...Bill:sad1:ops:Yeah I have driven one. Almost bought one before I bought my Jeep in 08. Answer me this genius. Where you gonna go 175 MPH? The Challengers in stock form by comparison are slow 0-60 compared to the rustang and cajunko and more costly. THAT is what I was referring to and it's a fact.
I don't think Ma is missing out by making a trim package to target a sales niche.
The Camaro and Mustang right off the lot are Lighter and More Horse Power.. So It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out the Hp. to weight ratio is way different and yes they will be faster...Over all and in the 60' times...Don't understand what is so hard to figure out...I just was mentioning the top speeds of the 3 were very close.. And OH by the way the cars tested Mustang and Camaro were 10K-15k higher in price and a year newer then the Base SRT8 Challenger ..No you didn't mention an article...But you did say."They should have brought it back as the Road Runner. Not that bloated underpowered overpriced Challenger. Bunch of marketing idiots they are". And for some that happen to own and the others that are true to the product/Mopar. I think it you should have all the facts before making comments you cant back...PERIOD
Mopar missed the boat......again