dibbons
Well-Known Member
MSN article 04/28/2019 (Popular Cars From Every Decade) written by Erica Corbin:
Back when I was driving a st hemi/66 belvedere , a 455 firebird tried to pass me on the 4 lane , guess who won that one ?! Embarrassed him so bad he passed on the shoulder when I came up behind a dump truck and slowed down .Those old 73 super duty cars, were good runners.
A neighbor 2 houses down had a super nice 4-speed one in the early 80's it was a nice car.
He blew the original 455 up one night coming home from a rock concert, he said he was cruising around 120 when the harmonic balancer came off and put a big dent in the hood.
We went up to the local junkyard and pulled an engine out of a 68 gto, it was a 400. Freshend the engine up with a fresh valve job, on the original super duty heads, rings and bearing and stuck it in the TA.
It still ran good, but that 455 really had some ***, way more than the 400.
Do you remember the first Firenza that GM sold. It was built in the U.K. with a small 4 cylinder engine. My friend bought one for his wife and then they divorced so he grabbed a 2.2 ltr engine and really beefed it up putting out over 300 HP. He beat a 455 Bird so bad they guy actually put it up for sale. He went through the speed traps at Watkins-Glen at 133 mph.Back when I was driving a st hemi/66 belvedere , a 455 firebird tried to pass me on the 4 lane , guess who won that one ?! Embarrassed him so bad he passed on the shoulder when I came up behind a dump truck and slowed down .
Do you remember the first Firenza that GM sold. It was built in the U.K. with a small 4 cylinder engine. My friend bought one for his wife and then they divorced so he grabbed a 2.2 ltr engine and really beefed it up putting out over 300 HP. He beat a 455 Bird so bad they guy actually put it up for sale. He went through the speed traps at Watkins-Glen at 133 mph.
From the factory they weren't fast but this thing was a rocket.Heard they were a little peppy, never really around one. They weren't big atround here , and always broke .
Only the "Ford" 455 had that kind of torque.And "Trump's a racist"....oops! Couldn't help myself.....Internet is like a published conversation. It doesn't have to be true to be published. Didn't the 455 SD (HO) have like 500 ft/lbs torque?
She ought to stick to writing about money, shopping, travel, etc...MSN article 04/28/2019 (Popular Cars From Every Decade) written by Erica Corbin:
View attachment 1715374652
You did make all this up, right? The Olds Firenza was first sold in '82 and it was not built in Europe, it was built on GM's new "J-car" FWD platform. Like a Chevy Cavalier. In other words, a shitbox. They never even had a 2.2L engine. There were 1.8L, 2.0L, and 2.8L engines available. They were all economy car engines. All pushrod engines, and all basically the cheapest crap GM could make. "300 hp" only in someone's fantasy world.Do you remember the first Firenza that GM sold. It was built in the U.K. with a small 4 cylinder engine. My friend bought one for his wife and then they divorced so he grabbed a 2.2 ltr engine and really beefed it up putting out over 300 HP. He beat a 455 Bird so bad they guy actually put it up for sale. He went through the speed traps at Watkins-Glen at 133 mph.
You did make all this up, right? The Olds Firenza was first sold in '82 and it was not built in Europe, it was built on GM's new "J-car" FWD platform. Like a Chevy Cavalier. In other words, a shitbox. They never even had a 2.2L engine. There were 1.8L, 2.0L, and 2.8L engines available. They were all economy car engines. All pushrod engines, and all basically the cheapest crap GM could make. "300 hp" only in someone's fantasy world.
So w t f is it? Looks like an Opel to me.View attachment 1715375432
It was actually built by Vauxhall U.K. but imported by Pontiac