Rocker arm recommendations?

dukeboy_318

FABO Gold Member
FABO Gold Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
52,067
Reaction score
28,100
Location
No
Finishing my order list tonight, just curious before I pull the trigger, besides Comp or Harland Sharp roller rockers, 1.5s, is there any other brands I should consider for reliability and durability? 440 with roller cam and RPM heads.
 

Heywodja

The Heartbeat Stops Here
FABO Gold Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
894
Location
Texas
^^^^^^^^^ what he said ^^^^^^^^^
 

jas0162

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2014
Messages
663
Reaction score
509
Location
kansas
I bought Hughes for my stroker motor. I dont like all the little needle bearings.
 

Bewy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
3,338
Reaction score
2,093
Location
Australia
I have just bought Comp rockers, steel. Look strong, haven't used them yet.

I would think twice about advice from B3 racing. There is a glaring fault in Part 2 of the rocker tech. Third paragraph, first line. He claims the rocker ratio [ on the valve/roller tip side ] remains constant through out the rocker's travel. It does not. If that basic premise is wrong, then I wonder about the rest of the advice....
 

famous bob

mopar misfit
Joined
Aug 14, 2011
Messages
20,074
Reaction score
9,264
Location
okla
Finishing my order list tonight, just curious before I pull the trigger, besides Comp or Harland Sharp roller rockers, 1.5s, is there any other brands I should consider for reliability and durability? 440 with roller cam and RPM heads.

I have had excellant service out og Hughs engines rocker arms so far----
 

Bighead440

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2017
Messages
434
Reaction score
370
Location
Milledgeville, Georgia
The bushed PRW stainless or Crane/Hughes (aluminum on shaft "bearing") work great and maintain oil pressure within the shaft better than the bleed-off you get with needle-bearing fulcrum rockers. This is very important if you have full time rocker oiling, which would need to be regulated/restricted with an orifice when using the needle-bearing rockers.
 

yellow rose

Overnight Sensation
Joined
Jun 19, 2015
Messages
28,501
Reaction score
22,868
Location
Central Washington
I have just bought Comp rockers, steel. Look strong, haven't used them yet.

I would think twice about advice from B3 racing. There is a glaring fault in Part 2 of the rocker tech. Third paragraph, first line. He claims the rocker ratio [ on the valve/roller tip side ] remains constant through out the rocker's travel. It does not. If that basic premise is wrong, then I wonder about the rest of the advice....


I was going to add my .02 cents but I figured you have it all figured out. A simple phone call will clear up any misunderstanding but that would require effort.
 

jas0162

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2014
Messages
663
Reaction score
509
Location
kansas
I bought the Hughes rockers BECAUSE THEY DONT HAVE the needle bearings. Sorry for the confusion
 

AndyF

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
1,955
Reaction score
2,244
Location
Oregon
Finishing my order list tonight, just curious before I pull the trigger, besides Comp or Harland Sharp roller rockers, 1.5s, is there any other brands I should consider for reliability and durability? 440 with roller cam and RPM heads.

A steel rocker arm is the best for reliability and durability. Not a lot of steel rockers on the market though. Comp makes a good set, RAS are great rockers if you can find them. The factory nodular rockers work fine if you can find them or old Isky nodulars if they haven't been abused. I run RAS on my engines but they are hard to come by.
DSC_3433 (Large).JPG
 

famous bob

mopar misfit
Joined
Aug 14, 2011
Messages
20,074
Reaction score
9,264
Location
okla
A steel rocker arm is the best for reliability and durability. Not a lot of steel rockers on the market though. Comp makes a good set, RAS are great rockers if you can find them. The factory nodular rockers work fine if you can find them or old Isky nodulars if they haven't been abused. I run RAS on my engines but they are hard to come by.
View attachment 1715732051

THANKS , but I run .650 offset intakes ----
 

moparmarks

zippindippintie
FABO Gold Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
2,973
Reaction score
1,895
Location
Western Colorado
Lifter failure. Cam failure. Rocker arm failure. On multiple motors during break in on the dyno. My machinist had two sets of their roll rockers fail during break in on the dyno on two different motors. I know of several different people including myself that have had many problems with Comp products. Call their customer service and they pretty much call you an idiot.
comp cam problems - Google Search

comp cam rocker problems - Google Search
 

B3RE

B³ Racing Engines
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
666
Reaction score
763
Location
USA
I have just bought Comp rockers, steel. Look strong, haven't used them yet.

I would think twice about advice from B3 racing. There is a glaring fault in Part 2 of the rocker tech. Third paragraph, first line. He claims the rocker ratio [ on the valve/roller tip side ] remains constant through out the rocker's travel. It does not. If that basic premise is wrong, then I wonder about the rest of the advice....
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but from an engineering perspective, a PROPERLY DESIGNED roller rocker will have a constant ratio. The effective fulcrum length does not change. But, good luck finding an off the shelf rocker that is properly designed. The only way to get that is a custom rocker. If the pushrod side is not designed with proper valve side geometry in mind, then the ratios will not necessarily be constant because the lobe lift inputs will be inaccurate and skew the results at the valve.

If that is the sole reason to discredit my work, then I guess there are a lot of companies that shouldn't be believed due to the sketchy info they promote. Ever read the Harland Sharp website on rocker geometry? How about Comp Cams info on rocker geometry? If you want to read or watch videos on something that doesn't make sense, you might want to start there, and you can find a whole lot more. In the end, I stand by my assertion that a properly designed roller rocker will have a constant ratio, and you will never achieve that with a shoe type rocker. Even a poorly designed roller rocker will do a better job than a shoe rocker, or there would be no point in having a roller.

I'm not afraid to admit I can, and do, make mistakes, and I have been wrong before. But, to discount everything I have learned over the years, over one thing you happen to disagree with, seems a bit over the top, imo.
 
Last edited:

toolmanmike

Moderator
Staff member
FABO Gold Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
72,709
Reaction score
70,060
Location
Office
Evryone is entitled to their opinion, but from an engineering perspective, a PROPERLY DESIGNED roller rocker will have a constant ratio. The effective fulcrum length does not change. But, good luck finding an off the shelf rocker that is properly designed. The only way to get that is a custom rocker. If the pushrod side is not designed with proper valve side geometry in mind, then the ratios will not necessarily be constant because the lobe lift inputs will be inaccurate and skew the results at the valve.

If that is the sole reason to discredit my work, then I guess there are a lot of companies that shouldn't be believed due to the sketchy info they promote. Ever read the Harland Sharp website on rocker geometry? How about Comp Cams info on rocker geometry? If you want to read or watch videos on something that doesn't make sense, you might want to start there, and you can find a whole lot more. In the end, I stand by my assertion that a properly designed roller rocker will have a constant ratio, and you will never achieve that with a shoe type rocker. Even a poorly designed roller rocker will do a better job than a shoe rocker, or there would be no point in having a roller.

I'm not afraid to admit I can, and do, make mistakes, and I have been wrong before. But, to discount everything I have learned over the years, over one thing you happen to disagree with, seems a bit over the top, imo.
Well said.
 

yellow rose

Overnight Sensation
Joined
Jun 19, 2015
Messages
28,501
Reaction score
22,868
Location
Central Washington
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but from an engineering perspective, a PROPERLY DESIGNED roller rocker will have a constant ratio. The effective fulcrum length does not change. But, good luck finding an off the shelf rocker that is properly designed. The only way to get that is a custom rocker. If the pushrod side is not designed with proper valve side geometry in mind, then the ratios will not necessarily be constant because the lobe lift inputs will be inaccurate and skew the results at the valve.

If that is the sole reason to discredit my work, then I guess there are a lot of companies that shouldn't be believed due to the sketchy info they promote. Ever read the Harland Sharp website on rocker geometry? How about Comp Cams info on rocker geometry? If you want to read or watch videos on something that doesn't make sense, you might want to start there, and you can find a whole lot more. In the end, I stand by my assertion that a properly designed roller rocker will have a constant ratio, and you will never achieve that with a shoe type rocker. Even a poorly designed roller rocker will do a better job than a shoe rocker, or there would be no point in having a roller.

I'm not afraid to admit I can, and do, make mistakes, and I have been wrong before. But, to discount everything I have learned over the years, over one thing you happen to disagree with, seems a bit over the top, imo.


Glad you found this. I was going to try and explain it, but no way can I do it like you do. And it wasn’t worth me jacking it up and then you needing to come back and correct me.

A simple phone call would have cleared it up, but that’s too hard for way too many.
 

AndyF

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
1,955
Reaction score
2,244
Location
Oregon
THANKS , but I run .650 offset intakes ----
But you aren't the OP. Far as I can tell, the OP doesn't need anything fancy. A set of used Isky nodulars would probably work just fine for what he is trying to do. If he can't find them then the best alternative on the market these days is the Comp steel rocker arms. One of the cars I help tune has a set of Comp steel rockers on a 505 big block with a fairly big solid roller. Engine makes 750 hp and the car runs 9's every weekend at the track. That is probably pushing it for Comps but they have lived okay for several years on that engine so they'll handle anything the OP needs.
 
Top