Back in Time
Well-Known Member
I think this carrying the letter of the law just a little too far.....Man Ticketed For Broken Windshield While He’s Getting It Fixed
All he had to do it's show up in court with proof that he was getting it fixed. They will throw it out.
My net is to show unfortunately to watch the vid. But u did read the small article
Well if the kid is smart,he will show up in court,the officer has to show up on the same date and there is a good chance he won't. Then the judge will throw it out.
Agree with the above statement. Same applies in phila. Traffic court. They have a stand by cop who reads the officers comments, and the ticket code. You never face the cop who wrote it.Gotta say, I don't know how the law is written there.
Here the officer doesn't have to show up. The ticket is the officer's written deposition and presented as evidence by the DA.
Agree with the above statement. Same applies in phila. Traffic court. They have a stand by cop who reads the officers comments, and the ticket code. You never face the cop who wrote it.
He'll the traffic court judges are just elected officials.
Nope he only has to show if you appeal.It is your constitutional right to face your accuser. Can't believe people let this fly
Well if you don't pay the fine and choose to appear in court you are appealing the ticket!Nope he only has to show if you appeal.
Sorry, I failed to see any inaccurate facts in those first two lines..........................just because you dont like the idea of someone getting a ticket for something their fixing to fix doesnt make it unnecessary
the proceeds of those tickets go to maintaining your local roads, putting bread on the tables of Denvers finest, feeds some of the lazy bums on welfare and lining the pockets of the elected officials of the state of Colorado
in all seriousness though, listen to the description of the damage "some stranger had picked up a rock and threw it at my windshield" (the reporter used the term smashed)
im not even going to mention the odds of this not being a stranger and the person whose windshield got damaged having some serious bad karma due
he was on his way to have the windshield replaced
not fixed
replaced
next time your in a junkyard, pick up a brick and throw it at random windshield and see what the damage is
Mr. Berlin then made the judgement call to endanger his fellow citizens by taking this car, with the severely reduced visibility out on public roads, very likely dropping glass splinters on the public roads, and neighboring pedestrians to drive to the carglass place and THAT is what he got ticket for
just because you dont like the idea of someone getting a ticket for something their fixing to fix doesnt make it unnecessary
the proceeds of those tickets go to maintaining your local roads, putting bread on the tables of Denvers finest, feeds some of the lazy bums on welfare and lining the pockets of the elected officials of the state of Colorado
in all seriousness though, listen to the description of the damage "some stranger had picked up a rock and threw it at my windshield" (the reporter used the term smashed)
im not even going to mention the odds of this not being a stranger and the person whose windshield got damaged having some serious bad karma due
he was on his way to have the windshield replaced
not fixed
replaced
next time your in a junkyard, pick up a brick and throw it at random windshield and see what the damage is
Mr. Berlin then made the judgement call to endanger his fellow citizens by taking this car, with the severely reduced visibility out on public roads, very likely dropping glass splinters on the public roads, and neighboring pedestrians to drive to the carglass place and THAT is what he got ticket for
No, you can't "appeal" the ticket, it's a charge for which you get a court hearing unless you plead guilty and pay the fine. Only after the court has ruled can you "appeal" the judgment.Well if you don't pay the fine and choose to appear in court you are appealing the ticket!
Sworn statements are permitted to be introduced in court in absetia. In the case of Police officers who are sworn officers of the court, they are not required to be present unless local law or ordinance requires it. There is no breach of Constitutionality here.It is your constitutional right to face your accuser. Can't believe people let this fly
Hmmm...certain of that?Woulda shoulda couda...He was in the glass shop parking lot.Cop was an *** for writing the ticket.
Right, after He operated an unsafe vehicle needlessly, a mobile van could've just as easily pulled up at his home & changed it there.Woulda shoulda couda...He was in the glass shop parking lot.Cop was an *** for writing the ticket.
Hmmm...certain of that?
Since we don't know the entire story nor the details of the stop and ticket, it is possible that the individual was driving around with a shattered windshield and when the cop followed him he decided to duck into a glass shop and claimed he was on his way there to get the glass replaced.
It's called "reasonable doubt". No one can convicted of doing something wrong (cops included) unless it is "beyond a reasonable doubt".
Quickness to judge the cop without the full details of the evidence is as equally wrong as what some people perceive the cop did to the driver.
It's a good thing we have rule of law in this country or lynch mobs would be rushing to judgment and hanging people without due process by which all evidence is presented before an impartial judge.
I think you are grabbing at straws to justify your opinion.Right, after He operated an unsafe vehicle needlessly, a mobile van could've just as easily pulled up at his home & changed it there.
The "$46" was a lesson to use better judgment next time, all roads ain't flatlands & 90 deg intersections.................................................
!