Sry for the confusion but i wasnt meaning to speak to or quote you. It will be okay, no need for such a defensive response, we are all here to help and learn.
Lol,Ok, my chidingly sarcastic puzzlement at your post,in which you quoted me & then
seemed to address me defensively sounded defensive?
My mistake, should've sprinkld
more emoticons in there. As far as the rest, I simply took the opportunity to clarify my own
stance on the subject,that is all.
As far as "research" goes, mine consisted of things like this. '72 /6 swinger 3200# loaded
w/fuel & myself, .870 t-bars, 1.125" frt bar, .75" rear bar, & 7 leaf stacks both sides. I then
proceeded to run down and practically run over almost anything I encountered in the nice
twisty-zones,incl. my then-neighbor & his 2yr. old IROC-Z w/VR skins. THAT is MY research.
Yes, those .870 bars should've been bigger, mainly for less dive under heavy braking &
occasional scraping on hard landings & dips. The car rode very comfortably, but was very
competent despite being soft, so I don't think .910 is "too soft" as your prob. not heavier
than I was.:glasses7: