Map63Vette
Well-Known Member
@Map63Vette Have you seen the AMP EFI Pro Evo + HC? It's their small packaged ECU with high current spark outputs so you don't have to use the quad spark module for "dumb" coils. It also has increased I/O over the old MS3X boxes. Very tempting to upgrade so I can add even more crap to it. You would have to use the Holley Dominator to be anywhere close to the amount of I/O, which would be well over $5K. It's only $1600 with a harness.
» MS3Pro EVO+ HC ECU
Be gone temptress!
Lol, I had not actually seen the +HC version before, but I haven't really cruised their options in general for a while either. I have considered upgrading several times as I wouldn't mind moving the whole system under the hood to free up my firewall a little more. Having two 20+ pin bulkheads through the firewall makes things a little busy at the back of my engine, plus the two QuadSparks sitting on my fender right now, especially now that I got my A/C installed and have even more hosing going on in that corner of the engine bay.
The I/O thing is borderline for me. I've used up most of what is available on my MS3X at this point, though some of it is more of a "just because I can" thing, not so much a "need to have". For instance, I used to run dual temp senders and had one for the gauge and one for the MS until I recently realized I could use one of the PWM outputs to drive the factory gauge. I wouldn't mind an extra input here so I could have stuff like a datalog switch or other configurable features, though I really wish you could do that through TunerStudio and "digital" buttons. It never made sense to me that TS couldn't do something like turning traction control on and off if it's already connected to the MS vs having to have a dedicated physical input for it. Most of what I'd be interested in at this point is probably analog input for sensors so I could get oil temp and stuff like that back available to view. I'm also just an engineer by trade, so I like having the numbers available, even if I don't do anything with them.
I've gotten good enough with the CAN stuff that I can kind of get around some of the I/O limitations if I wanted to though, at least I think. There's still a limit to how many CAN channels you can actually run, and it takes more hardware to do it, though the hardware is cheap enough. I haven't played with doing the analog data over CAN yet, but in principle it's not really that different, you just have to do the ADC conversion. My current problem is more finding a better way to split up the 5V reference power. I have it running to enough different sensors than the splicing is getting annoying. I need to just buy a Deutsch bussed connector and terminate them all there. Then if I want to add another sensor it's as easy as pulling a plug from the connector and adding a new wire.
Though I am kind of tempted to see what I might be able to sell my system for though. If I got a good enough price for my MS3X box and a pair of QuadSparks it could offset the cost of the new system decently. The harness gets a little trickier though because of where everything terminates on my setup today. Depending on where I'd want to mount the ECU I'd likely still have to extend most of my wires, which I would rather not do, so the flying lead harness probably makes more sense. Then I'd only need to buy new terminals for all of my connectors if I don't still have extras from the first time around.

















