@RichardR
The proper angle is for the bottom of the shackle to be rearwards of the top of the shackle. At least a distance of a
1 inch. More the better. But not so much as to contact anything when the suspension is compressed. (Moved downwards)
Below, my chit box Duster w/S/S springs. This is the farthest the shackles can be. This is actually not the best spot to sit at rest with.
Below, reproduction HD springs on the wife’s ‘67 Cuda. Notice the slight rearward location of the bottom of the shackle. This is correct. More movement backwards wouldn’t be so bad. But just a little is all that is there.
Below, my other chit box ‘73 Cuda. This car has the OE-XHD 440/HEMI springs. The lower shackle position is ideal. This amount of room is unavailable to the stock A bodies due to there system of mounting parts.
Below are the same springs in the wrong year car. A ‘79 Dodge Magnum. The springs sat the rear of the car stupidly low. It looked dumb as hell. To adjust the height, I used longer off the shelf shackles. While there just, OK for use, I do not recommend using the lower two holes to lift the car or correct something else wrong or to your dislike of the car.
Extending the shackle length starts to upset handling and adds more sway to the rear of the car under hard conditions. The linger the shackle length, the worse the car will react.
But again, the shackles location is very good. The extra length on the shackle here is OK. The car still handles well.
S/S springs on a A body often have a bit of adjustment needed for them for best useage. There was a fella here, or company as I sort of remember, that made spacers that went infront of the front ya get to move the axle backwards for tire fitment. This moving of the rear axles centerline (center of the wheel) also moves the shackles location back as well. The same amount as the spacer.