Ok my bad. You did quote my post though.
I was replying to you. I was telling you not to take stock in some BS thrown around numbers any idiot can make up. Just because the Streetmaster can be had cheapest doesn't make it the best choice. That's my whole point. A single plane intake is never the best choice for a mild street build, yet the OP bought his BS hook line and sinker.
I guess he wants his car to be 20 plus LB FT down on the bottom end compared to the stock intake, and that's cool. At least his engine will look good.
There's one for a small block on Ebay right now for 112 bucks with two days left. Even if someone has one somewhere for his quoted 85 bucks, I would pay 120 instead for a good non EGR stock intake first.
If you're not running a 3.91 or numerically higher gear and a loose converter, a single plane intake is a power killer. In fact, when there are intakes like the RPM Air Gap available, they almost make single planes unnecessary, except in all out race stuff like what would use a Victor.
Dual planes are better than single planes on the street Period. Always have been. Always will be. Everybody knows it. But some guy with a lot of blowhard nonsense spouts something off and a bunch of yall jump right over the cliff after him. He said nobody here has anything fast anyway. Even if that's so, which it's not, why the hell would anybody want to put some junk on their car to make it slower?
I'll give the Streetmaster one thing. Of all the single plane intakes, it's probably the one that will have more bottom end grunt, but it's still a single plane. I've seen IQ52 say "just run what you have" concerning intakes.....and he's right. BUT, IMO, with a mild street build, you don't want to let anything take away from bottom end torque. You want it optimized, and a single plane intake does not do that.
All of this of course is simply my opinion, based on my own personal experience.
RustyRatRod copyright 2014.
All rights reserved.