abody super cuda...

[abodyjoe]

what says you??

 

[Frankie]

Not really my cup of tea, but I do like all the filled seams, and the smoothed body panels.

 

[67cudafb]

Serious time and money there but not my cup of tea.

 

[MoparDaddy]

God damn it. This car is worse than a Chinese freakin yo-yo. Just when you forget it, it comes right back...

 

[74Dusted]

Interesting that it has a Pennsylvania Inspection Sticker and License Plate, but would definitely be illegal in Pennsylvania.

 

[3406pk]

Hey its just a super cool custom. Tons of work and craftsmanship. Very cool.

 

[chryslerfat]

I respect the amount of work that went into that.

 

[Princess Valiant]

I would drive that before a real superbird. because a superbird is a beach whale and this is going to have the same comfy ride like an a-body and its a more manageable size .....at least for me. The reason I am getting out of B-bodies is because I am little and B-bodies are some wooly mammoth cars.

 

[68coupe]

Damn, I love it! And, I own a 68 Hdtp.

 

[madmoparmick]

Wow. Who built it? Why would it be illegal in Pa.?

 

[68coupe]

Wow. Who built it? Why would it be illegal in Pa.?

No headlights? It does appear to have a valid rear plate.

 

[abodyjoe]

headlights were on the underside of the beak..

 

[74Dusted]

Wow. Who built it? Why would it be illegal in Pa.?

No headlights. If those are headlights (looks like parking lights/turn signals in the bottom of the nose), then they would be too low to the ground to be legal in PA.

The only exception to that is Antique Registered Vehicles (and they can't be driven at night anyway), which don't require Inspection and have their own unique "Antique Vehicle" License Plate. The car has an inspection sticker, and a regular plate.

[ame]http://www.dmv.state.pa.us/pdotforms/pub_45/tables.pdf[/ame]

Table 3, requirement on headlight height.

[ame]http://www.dmv.state.pa.us/pdotforms/pub_45/SubchapterE.pdf[/ame]

Subchapter E, Section 175.66, Lighting and Electrical Requirements.

 

[inkjunkie]

Even uglier than a real winged car...

 

[magnumdust]

He needs to redo those tail lights. The rest of it is pretty decent for what it is.

 

[NC Engine Builder]

Lots of work, but def not for me......

 

[ramenth]

I like it. The nose and the spoiler blend well with the body style. The taillights and the rear bumper, on the other hand, need to go. Just doesn't fit with the rest of the car.

 

[longarm]

Pretty sweet!!!
A lot of work and planning went into it.
I do agree the tail lights look kind of off considering
how the rest of the car looks....... to me anyway.

 

[Downtime!]

Seems pretty well done, wish I was talented enough to pull that off on my Scamp.

 

[Bulldozer]

lame

 

[MOBodyman]

I like it pretty well myself. However, I have to agree with those that don't like the rear. I would have tried to incorporate a '70 (b-body) tailpanel. Shouldn't be too hard to do in comparison to the rest of the work done.

I also think it would look better with a chrome rear bumper with the corners a bit more rounded.

And lastly, I'm not a fan of the 'supercuda' decals. Somehow the gray looks out of place. Something a bit more like the original style would fit the theme better.

All that said, it's way nicer than any of the old cars I ever owned and I'd drive it every time I could if I owned it.
Dallas

 

[75slant6]

Doesn't look as good from a direct side shot and I agree with the taillight comments but would I drive it? Heck yea I would!!

View attachment image.jpg

 

[360Scamp]

I like it! I will never own a wing car so this would be a cool alternative

 

[360Scamp]

The only things missing is the vinyl top and the vents on the front fenders

 

[dcdriver]

Here's a couple more from different manufactors. Both are built on the new Challenger chassis.