Converting Hyd Roller Lifters to Solid

-
I've used it to make solid lifters out of hydraulic lifters for decades. I never had any issues with using 7075. It's actually stronger than 1018 steel.

Tom
Finally someone who's actually done it and not just read about it on the internet. Have you ever converted a set of these factory roller lifters?
 
I know it's just a theoretical question, but, usually the purpose of going from hydro to solid is purely for performance. The RPM range moves up. That is a ton of lifter body to move, with a less than ideal lifter angle already. It's been done, and will continue to be done, I know...... An actual solid roller lifter that is actually designed to do the job will be best. I have done it only to use as a checker for degreeing camshaft.
 
No, the RPM range does not necessarily move up just by switching from hyd to sol lifters. If the springs are adequate, there will be no lifter pump up with the hyd lifters & there would be no change in the RPM range. If the springs were too soft, you could get pump up with hyd lifters......but you could also get valve float with sol lifters.
 
No, the RPM range does not necessarily move up just by switching from hyd to sol lifters. If the springs are adequate, there will be no lifter pump up with the hyd lifters & there would be no change in the RPM range. If the springs were too soft, you could get pump up with hyd lifters......but you could also get valve float with sol lifters.
I didn't think I needed to explain it so thoroughly. Usually, when one goes to a solid roller, the profile is more than STOCK..... Remember, just a theoretical question in the first place.....
 
Some bonehead (me) lost one of the retaining rings of the lifters I've been cleaning up to the moon's gravitational pull. Does anyone know the appropriate size internal snap ring to use as a retaining ring for these lifters? It seems to be between a 5/8" and 11/16" internal snap ring size. I'm thinking 16mm? Time for a trip to the hardware store...

1753237901966.png
 
Does anyone make a solid roller lifter that can be retained by the factory dogbones/hold downs. I've never seen a set.

If you can spin out a spacer, it's a cheap way to get a solid roller set up in a magnum or LA roller block.
I've not seen any. That said, I've often wondered if solid roller lifters could be machined with the flats to allow the dog bones to hold them in place......
 
NOTHING sounds better than (properly adjusted) solid lifters
 
I've not seen any. That said, I've often wondered if solid roller lifters could be machined with the flats to allow the dog bones to hold them in place......

Ramm did something with lifters that had the wrong flats orientation on a build using jesels or something like that. A knucklehead in here made the suggestion :)


I'd spin out a spacer turning the OEM hyd into a solid. Starting with a fresh solid roller, gonna have to machine them a bit
 
Last edited:
Again, I have to ask, Why? Why not just buy solid lifters? Unless this is just thinking out loud.
 
Well....one reason would be that sol roller lifters are expensive. So if you have hyd lifters sitting on the shelf gathering dust...why not convert to solid.
 
Some bonehead (me) lost one of the retaining rings of the lifters I've been cleaning up to the moon's gravitational pull. Does anyone know the appropriate size internal snap ring to use as a retaining ring for these lifters? It seems to be between a 5/8" and 11/16" internal snap ring size. I'm thinking 16mm? Time for a trip to the hardware store...

View attachment 1716433424
For anyone who sees the thread in the future, the 16 mm snap ring might work. I picked one up and installed it, but the ring is fully expanded without any tension in the groove. In other words, it's a tad loose. I may try to see if 16.5 mm (or whatever the imperial equivalent is) snap rings exist.
 
Last edited:

These are the snap rings that were suggested to me by a member here (can't remember who).

Hydraulic Lifters Snap Ring
I saw those and ended up calling them. The gentleman I spoke to told me that since they're designed for smaller Chevrolet lifters, they would likely be too small for a Chrysler application.

Did you end up buying them? How did they fit?
 
I saw those and ended up calling them. The gentleman I spoke to told me that since they're designed for smaller Chevrolet lifters, they would likely be too small for a Chrysler application.

Did you end up buying them? How did they fit?

I bought a couple to test and the one I tried seemed to work just fine.
 
I saw those and ended up calling them. The gentleman I spoke to told me that since they're designed for smaller Chevrolet lifters, they would likely be too small for a Chrysler application.

Did you end up buying them? How did they fit?

Also, without comparing actual measurements I don't see how that statement even makes sense.

People use chevy rods, rockers etc on these motors, the only thing that should matter is the size, not the application.
 
Also, without comparing actual measurements I don't see how that statement even makes sense.

People use chevy rods, rockers etc on these motors, the only thing that should matter is the size, not the application.
It's the size that's the issue (according to the guy I talked to). Chevy lifters have a .842" OD whereas Mopar lifters are .904" if I recall. I would assume the OD of the snap ring groove is larger on the Mopar as well.
 
It's the size that's the issue (according to the guy I talked to). Chevy lifters have a .842" OD whereas Mopar lifters are .904" if I recall. I would assume the OD of the snap ring groove is larger on the Mopar as well.

I'll show a pic later. The snap rings are pretty close and the crower ones are, in my opinion, far less likely to self eject from the top of the lifter in any case.
 
-
Back
Top Bottom