Could use some help identifying some roller rockers

-
Those are the super locks, and typically that area around the valve tip is solid steel. These are definitely the matching locks for a lash cap... only question is whether or not they were new unground tip valves and somebody paid attention to whether or not the cap contacts the lock itself at the very bottom as PHR said.
From the angle, it appears there's no lash cap on Earth that could work there without contacting the locks. But then, this is all from a picture, so who knows?
 
I don't see hardly any space at all around the sides of the valve tip. I cannot see how a lash cap will fit there without depressing the locks.
I had played with this kind of setup once with some J heads in mine so that I could fit a 1.80. I was younger and broke, I filed the caps to make them lil shallower because I had already ground the tips some when I set up the wear pattern of these roller rockers I was using.. got it centered.. but then a cam change necessitated more spring height and well.. tail chasing began. I ended up changing the valve job a little putting it a hair further down which actually helped and the flow department and found a kmotion spring to sue my needs...so I skipped the cap idea and theyre in a bag somewhere in one of my valvetrain parts cabinets.
 
it appears there's no lash cap on Earth that could work there without contacting the locks.

I agree.

Magnum valves have very little space from the lock groove to the tip.
In my mind, a lash cap would need to have very little depth to be able to contact the tip and not the locks.

Frankly, I’d say the whole spring/retainer/lock situation on those heads needs a re-do.

Factory set up:

IMG_4083.png


IMG_4084.png


IMG_4086.png
 
Last edited:
I agree.

Magnum valves have very little space from the lock groove to the tip.
In my mind, a lash cap would need to have very little depth to be able to contact the tip and not the locks.

Frankly, I’d say the whole spring/retainer/lock situation on those heads needs a re-do.
Hughes drop in 1101 or whatever they are, or change the valves 'longer mag style valves' le$$..... or the whole enchilada, valves- springs -locks.
 
I agree.

Magnum valves have very little space from the lock groove to the tip.
In my mind, a lash cap would need to have very little depth to be able to contact the tip and not the locks.

Frankly, I’d say the whole spring/retainer/lock situation on those heads needs a re-do.

View attachment 1716485919

View attachment 1716485920
...maybe valves too, depending on what whatever cam he's running needs for sprAngs.
 
How much does the valve length play into the geometry with the Chevy rockers? Would the keepers with the lash caps and (maybe?) the taller overall valve height make things better?

Wondering if whomever assembled the heads used the funky valve spring keepers and lash caps to adjust some of that.

How much does the valve length play into the geometry with the Chevy rockers? Would the keepers with the lash caps and (maybe?) the taller overall valve height make things better?

Wondering if whomever assembled the heads used the funky valve spring keepers and lash caps to adjust some of that.
The valve stem length listed below had proper rocker arm contact with Chevrolet rockers on the 318B running a .550" SFT. Fitment was inspected using the 1.5 Chevrolet pushrod length checking tool and the rockers swept the vale tip fine.

The Rocker arms in your photo look like re-boxed Elgin brand.

HUG 1038A+100​

INTAKE VALVE 8MM STEM 1.92" HEAD

1 PIECE STAINLESS STEEL POLISHED 5.02" LENGTH
 
@PRH, have you ever seen or setup a Magnum head to run this type of retainer? Thoughts on why it might be setup like this?

Honestly, what comes to mind is……. They were set up by someone who didn’t understand how those parts interact with each other.

It’s a failure waiting to happen.

Edit- In light of the info in post #33, it appears efforts were made to make that combo of parts work(without imminent failure).
 
Last edited:
So my HF calipers say the valve tip is about 0.06" above the lock. I popped the cap off the neighboring valve (wasn't as stuck as I thought) and it measured 0.0495" in the cup.

The one lash cap I looked at does look like it has been messed with, but then again I'm no expert so maybe that's how they look. I will get a picture later.
 
If the inner depth is less than the tip protrusion above the locks, then “technically” it’s okay, if you’re comfortable with it.

The “short” hemi lash caps have an inner depth of about .110”.
 
If the inner depth is less than the tip protrusion above the locks, then “technically” it’s okay, if you’re comfortable with it.

The “short” hemi lash caps have an inner depth of about .110”.
I'd be skeered. That's mighty close for somethin you don't need to mess around with.
 
I'd be skeered. That's mighty close for somethin you don't need to mess around with.

No argument. Nice thing is, I don't have any plans for these heads right now and whatever I might use them on probably doesn't need anything as "exotic" as this setup. So nothing I need to lose sleep over, at least for now.
 
If the inner depth is less than the tip protrusion above the locks, then “technically” it’s okay, if you’re comfortable with it.

The “short” hemi lash caps have an inner depth of about .110”.
Depending on what it was, I “might” try it on something of my own, but I’d never let something like that go out to a customer.
 

I’m running these on my NZ EQ’s with Beehives… no issues.


I basically copied IMM’s build with the exception for the pushrods… I measured mine and custom ordered from Smith Brothers.

Here’s the article: Dodge Magnum 360ci Small-Block Build and Dyno Test
 
I’m running these on my NZ EQ’s with Beehives… no issues.

[/URL][/URL]

I basically copied IMM’s build with the exception for the pushrods… I measured mine and custom ordered from Smith Brothers.

Here’s the article: Dodge Magnum 360ci Small-Block Build and Dyno Test
Yep: "I basically copied IMM’s build." Brian ironed out the details for a successful "Magnum headed LA build" long ago...
 
So when are these going on a 318 build !!!!!!?
Agreed. Its a disappointment that there is no 12:1 Icon pistons for the Magnum head combustion chamber, let alone in 3.910 bore. I have a SFT that 251/251 .570 on a 105lsa begging for a 318 and the EQ heads...
 
-
Back
Top Bottom