cjh
Well-Known Member
I have never liked front wheel drives. This pic sums it up nicely.
FWD is wrong wheel drive, it is against the laws of nature.
We need look no further than the natural world to see that there are no animals that are propelled primarily by their front legs; therefore FWD is repugnant in the eyes of God!
FWD is wrong wheel drive, it is against the laws of nature.
We need look no further than the natural world to see that there are no animals that are propelled primarily by their front legs; therefore FWD is repugnant in the eyes of God!
Sea Turtles... who wants to drive a sea turtle?
FWD is wrong wheel drive, it is against the laws of nature.
We need look no further than the natural world to see that there are no animals that are propelled primarily by their front legs; therefore FWD is repugnant in the eyes of God!
JMO, but i've always looked at the typical FWD cars as good budget track cars and when you crash them, you're not destroying anything special.(unless its a type-r integra)
hate to stir up an old thread but i guess i have to teach you old guys and honda-haters something. first of all i drive a 2001 honda prelude type-sh, so i can prove a few of these statements wrong and right. my car has a sytem called ATTS, stands for active torque transfer system. basically depending on how much throttle and how hard im cutting a turn it transfers the engine power to the outside drive wheel, reducing plowing or other FWD cornering issues. car and driver named it the best handling car for under 30k when it came out in 1997, so it handles. its powered by an H22a4 2.2liter engine DOHC 16 valve all aluminum engine. it puts out 220 hp, thats 100hp per liter.. how much does your car put out per liter? i also get 35mpg on the highway and run 14.9 at the racetrack, all i have is a stage one racing clutch, aluminum flywheel and a k&n filter. hope you learned something
My take on FWD verses RWD.
RWD - middle passenger in back seat gets a sore ***
Jack