If I knew this, I had forgotten

-

67Dart273

FABO Gold Member
FABO Gold Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
62,697
Reaction score
37,144
Location
Idaho
"Nitro isn't a fuel, it's an excuse"


As an old guy, there are "some race cars" that stick in my mind to this day. One is the old "Freight Train" dual blown Chev "top gas" dragster. (In it's last season, before NHRA decided to dump "top gas" it ran dual blown hemis)

freight_train_22.jpg


freight_train_6.jpg



I can still remember it showing up in 66 or 67 at Deer Park in Spokane. What I DID NOT know or have long forgotten is one of the DRIVERs

The "Freight Train" was driven by a number of people, some well known, but one in particular caught my eye, one "Floyd Lippencotte Jr". It seems his dad forbade him from racing, that is, his real self, Bob Muravez, so he cooked up the Floyd name to avoid his father's rath. The story goes that his Dad DID find out at some point, and allegedly never spoke to Floy........er I mean Bob, again!!!!

http://www.thefreighttrain.com/


A quote from the webpage:

"Train "engineers” included (random order) Bob Brissette, Craig Breedlove, Tom McEwen, Mickey Thompson, Bill Alexander, Leonard Harris, Roy “Goob” Tuller, Billy The Kid Scott, Gerry Glenn, Bob Noice, Sam Davis (pictured), Walt Rhodes, and the infamous Floyd Lippencotte Jr., AKA Bob Muravez. Behind each and every one of them was the “real” engineer of the entire saga, toiling quietly in preparation for another of its seemingly endless appearances, John Peters.

Bob Muravez made over 1300 runs in the car, that’s over 325 miles in a digger! At one point he won 28 consecutive rounds of competition before losing to a red light. Through suggestion from track announcer Mel Reck and track operator Steve Gibbs, and because of a peculiar family circumstance, Bob adopted the Lippencotte handle for several years. He was rarely photographed during the period, and was undoubtedly the most notorious drag race driver in the sport’s history, for driving and winning national meets using an alias.

freight_train_38.jpg
 
My question is, just how in the hell do they connect the 2 Hemis together? I mean really they bolt the front Harmonic balancer with the transmission spine through a first bell housing? (I have NEVER been close enough to see how this is done)

Even those cars with 4 motors, how the hell is THAT done?
 
There's a photo on the website posted below, just a simple no 50 double roller chain coupler. That's what I used to hook the output of the Toyota transmission to the Cletrac transmission input on my little crawler, tho it might have even been no 40

Essentially all this amounts to is a matched pair of sprockets back to back, with a length of double chain wrapped around, connected with a master link. Simple

http://www.hotrod.com/hotroddeluxe/..._freight_train_top_gas_dragster/photo_07.html

The little Toyotrac / Cleota in progress. I've since sold it:

http://cletrac.org/forum2010/index.php?topic=2321.0

sqi934.jpg


73135i.jpg


w6ru40.jpg
 

Attachments

SO its a chain connection that's mere a double chain between the rear of the front motor and the harmonic balancer of the rear one? With blown Hemi motors in-line, I would be in question to the strength of that connection failing, and watching metal shred between the 2 motors.....

And this was the only way its been done? On the rail rods, was done this same way?
 
We used to go to the tractor pulls and there was more then one guy running 7 Blown Rodeck Big blocks !! Unbelievable to watch and FEEL that thing go by !!
 
SO its a chain connection

I have no idea how strong this really is. I'm sure if you consult the catalogs that show chain couplings, there's torque figures in there. I'd also bet this was exceeded, LOL

You'll have to ask "Mr Peters" how reliable this was
 
We used to go to the tractor pulls and there was more then one guy running 7 Blown Rodeck Big blocks !! Unbelievable to watch and FEEL that thing go by !!

I seriously can't imagine. Horsepower, that's more like plane power......
 
I have no idea how strong this really is. I'm sure if you consult the catalogs that show chain couplings, there's torque figures in there. I'd also bet this was exceeded, LOL

You'll have to ask "Mr Peters" how reliable this was

Interesting to say the least........ I can't imagine that tho how something, really that simple, to work well, you know?
 

-
Back
Top Bottom