Nitrous....we've come full circle......

-

67Dart273

FABO Gold Member
FABO Gold Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
62,697
Reaction score
37,138
Location
Idaho
The first I have known of nitrous in combustion engines for performance--at least on any scale-- was by the Germans in WWII. I actually found out about this when looking over an UNLIMITED HYDRO engine back when folks were trying to restore "Miss Spokane."
(Bear in mind that at one time, unlimited hydros used to run on Lake Coeur d Alene)

GM-1 - Wikipedia
GM-1 (Göring Mischung 1) was a system for injecting nitrous oxide (laughing gas) into aircraft engines that was used by the Luftwaffe in World War II. This increased the amount of oxygen in the fuel mixture, and thereby improved high-altitude performance. GM-1 was used on a number of modifications of existing fighter designs in order to counter the increasing performance of Allied fighters at higher altitudes.

A different system for low-altitude boost known as MW 50 was also used, although GM-1 and MW 50 were rarely used on the same engine. MW-50 was a methanol-water injection system, which injected a mixture of methanol and water into the cylinders to cool the mix. Cooling causes the air to become denser, therefore allowing more air into each cylinder for a given volume. This is the same principle that intercoolers use.

GM-1 was developed in 1940 by Otto Lutz to improve high-altitude performance. It could be used by fighters, destroyers, bombers and reconnaissance aircraft, though its first use was in the Bf 109E/Z fighter. Originally, it was liquified under high pressure and stored in several high-pressure vessels until it was found that low-temperature liquefied nitrous oxide gave better performance due to improved charge cooling. It could also be stored and handled more conveniently and was less vulnerable to enemy fire.

And now, we are drag racing supercharged, injected, nitrous added STOL aircraft LOL







 

Yep, it's pretty well documented, both WW's were an unfortunately ugly driver of tech discovery & advancement. I posted back early when I joined, an exerpt from an old publication "Automotive Industries" in the '20's, comparing 2 vs 4 OHV performance/pros & cons. Lots of ideas were just ahead of their time, but the good ones will have their day. It took 70yrs for the 4v head to become commonplace, & that was completely doable when it was concieved, only $$$ & acceptance stopped it....
 
-
Back
Top Bottom