I use photoshop extensively and it took me nearly 2 years to get really good at it...add another 2 years to become expert.GIMP GIMP - GNU Image Manipulation Program is free and has huge online support (you can even make boobies bigger!) and has a book of commands...of course Picasa was pretty nice considering it was dropped by Google 5 years ago but you can still find old copies. One touch usually made a underexposed or overesposed pic viewable. Photoshop and lightroom are huge and take a semester in college to learn.
True, but once you master it...you can do some pretty cool stuff!There you go: I said a semester, that must of been the "intro to photoshop" course..."Turn on computer......!
Topaz Studio – The Photographer's Editing ToolboxSO I see someone said photoshop which is a great program, but hard to master. @inkjunkie what did you use?
Riddler
Lightroom does indeed have a learning curve...but it is pretty flat compared to Photoshop. My thing with the track is strictly voluntary...no $$ for me. The tracks management has asked me to help them out with social media presence. Have no idea how things are going to go when their regular photographer is there.My side hustle for several years was sports photography, and I use Lightroom exclusively. It’s got a learning curve for sure, but once you get a work flow sorted out it rules.
It all depends on the results you’re looking for.
As for Danica with biguns, she’s still a *****. I’ve had media credentials to about ten NASCAR events and not once did I ever see her acting any different. Her in car audio was worse.
One of the beautiful things about LR, you can sync settings across batches of photos. In your example, you fix the WB on the first one, then sync it to all of them taking less than half a minute.Lightroom does indeed have a learning curve...but it is pretty flat compared to Photoshop. My thing with the track is strictly voluntary...no $$ for me. The tracks management has asked me to help them out with social media presence. Have no idea how things are going to go when their regular photographer is there.
I am pretty impressed with the Topaz Suite. I have yet to download the instruction manual for it.
I look at photos that others have edited and am blown away by how artistic they are. I am not one for very bright, vibrant edits.
One of the problems I have is to remember to change the settings in the camera. I was messing around with my Speedlite flash, set the White Balance to flash. Proceeded to take several hundred images on a sunny day. Lots of white balance adjustments...lol.
Bu but but bt ..........he's CROSSEYED LOLI always liked shooting film in black and white.View attachment 1715127934 View attachment 1715127936
Bu but but bt ..........he's CROSSEYED LOL
One of the many features in Lightroom that I really do like is the ability to convert to black & white. Then you can toggle between the two. Being non-destructive makes things a bit more less frightening as well. Don't like what you have done just go to the bottom of the history tab and hit the import button, right back to as shot. Mike, did you have your own dark room?I always liked shooting film in black and white.View attachment 1715127934 View attachment 1715127936
Yup, just figured that one out. I have a ton of learning to do. Would probably be in my best interest to actually take some "real" classes but I absolutely despise going to town, we are about 35 miles from Spokane. Some days I am seriously allergic to stupidity....by the time we get to town I am about ready to explode. A few folks have told me that I have the "eye" fro photography, I don't see it but we are often our own worse critics.One of the beautiful things about LR, you can sync settings across batches of photos. In your example, you fix the WB on the first one, then sync it to all of them taking less than half a minute.
Not that I’ve ever had to do that.
I never had my own darkroom but spent a lot of hours in our darkroom in high school. There is a lot of magic that can go on there.Mike, did you have your own dark room?
x2. The devil is in the details and experience plus a good eye is what makes the biggest difference in the quality of the finished image.I've been working with Photoshop on a daily basis some 20+ years in the print and magazine layout business. From removing distracting objects in backgrounds/foregrounds, doing 'interesting' touch-ups for calendar models, changing entire colors, to enhance/fix lighting, saturation and sharpness in (badly shot) photo's.
These days the tools to alter photos have become more easily available to everyone. But imo you still needexperience to create a 'finished' looking image.