Trick flow BBM rocker arms

-

92b

FABO Gold Member
FABO Gold Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2013
Messages
1,819
Reaction score
1,468
Location
Breda,Iowa
Saw this at PRI.

20251213_091252.jpg
 

That they are bushed is a bonus.

Edit: I forgot to add when rockers are bushed like that I almost always get full time oil to the rockers. The bushings last longer.

And I do not groove the cam or similar. I block the oil with the cam bearing so it can’t get through the cam and out to the passage in the block.

I clock the cam bearing so it block the holes ( just the number 4 cam bearing on a BBM) and then pick the oil up off the oil pressure gauge port internally in the block.

Doing that means no oil from the crank is going to the rockers.

On the big blocks one main is feeding both heads. That’s stupid but that’s how they did it.

Obviously this stuff wasn’t engineered for what we do with it so as a builder you need to figure out how to stop the carnage that happens when the heads pull too much oil from the main bearing.

I think I have some pictures of my SB. I’ll post them if I kept them.

Edit II: pictures


IMG_1004.jpeg
IMG_1003.jpeg
IMG_1005.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Those look nice. If they are under $1000 or right around it, they should sell. My 505 is running the RAU bushed and stainless rockers - and they are nice. I think I paid around $1200 - $1300 for them a couple years ago.
 

I wonder if they are needle bearing or bushed.
I wish a set that looked that good was available with an offset, for $900.
The way they're made, they kinda look offset. Maybe they're just tryin to be fancy.
 
Yeah, I was looking for a QUALITY set for a Victor or Victor clone (SM) under $1000.
There really is NO reason for TF to make such.
Yeah, since they don't offer anything with the valves offset from stock, why would they? Then need to , I think.
 
-
Back
Top Bottom