Just for educational purposes I would like to know that myself.Okay let’s get some options for the best carburetor for a 273 commando thanks .
www.forabodiesonly.com
.I have a 1050 Holley 3 barrel that would be perfect.
I have a 1050 Holley 3 barrel that would be perfect.

If you are running an automatic, you might just change the Accelerator Pump Nozzle to a larger size like they did on the originals.Right now have a 600 on it. Have just a little hesitation when I first hit the gas . But moves really good after that . Thinking about changing the pump accelerator. Then looking at the jets and the step up springs .
Normally aspirated cfm baseline is;
(CID x RPM/3450) x VE = cfm
Example-1
(273 x 5000)/3450 = 396cfm@100% efficiency
396 x 85%, on a hot engine , = 337cfm
Example-2
With a 2bbl compression ratio and cam etcetera, say at 70%, shifting at 4400, this maths to ~244cfm.
Example-3
a 600 is good to 7600@100%
Example-4
I'd put a
small Thermoquad on it, with an old "DualPort"
Just saying.
If it runs best with a 750 thermo why didn't the factory put them on it?This is why I never use those calculations. A 273 will run the best with a 750 cfm Thermo-Quad, more, power and better mpg. No way I'd run a restrictive intake manifold on one like an Offy dual port or Edelbrock sp2p or Streetmaster.
The carb didn't exist back in the 60's when the 273's were made.If it runs best with a 750 thermo why didn't the factory put them on it?
Google tells me thermoquads came on engines in USA from 71-74. Pretty much when engines lost compression.The carb didn't exist back in the 60's when the 273's were made.
273s were all done by 69, High Performance 273's were done by 1967. I have tried almost every 4 barrel carb, and a lot of intake manifolds, on a hot and almost stock 273, and I can tell you nothing is better than a TQ on a 273. The original AFB is better than most, almost like it was calibrated just for it. I tried a Holley, and it worked OK, I'm just not interested in having to work on a carb all the time. I do not like them.If it runs best with a 750 thermo why didn't the factory put them on it?
71 was still good compression, the TQ just works and it still passed emissions, that is why it lived on to the end. It is also adaptable to use on a very wide range of engine sizes.Google tells me thermoquads came on engines in USA from 71-74. Pretty much when engines lost compression.