Sorry, my brain must've been unplugged. I've fixed the link so it goes to the oil filter study.
There's no difference between a "synthetic oil filter" and a "dino oil filter", though some companies claim otherwise as a marketeering pitch. It's a little confusing because some filters (such as the Fleetguard LF-3487 I mentioned) use a "synthetic" media, by which is meant non-"paper". Assuming good materials and build quality, that kind of media does a better job over a longer period of time, but there are plenty of very good filters with "paper" media -- again, it's pretty much down to how long you plan on leaving the filter on there. I have already told the story of the '92 LeBaron with the Chrysler 2.5-litre 4-cylinder bought with 70k on it; I ran Mobil-1 (or occasionally other brands of store-shelf synth oil), changed the oil every 16k miles and the Wix or Purolator filter every 8k miles. Cylinders still had cross-hatch and engine had none of the common piston pin knock when I sold it with 170k on it. YMMV!
All the filters that are used in base-down applications (i.e., the base of the filter is at the bottom when the filter is installed) have an anti-drainback valve in them. This includes the large and medium filters for our Mopars, because they were used base-down on the slant-6 and in lots of other applications. The design and effectiveness of the ADBV varies; it's another reason to pick a good filter (and another point on which Frams are known to suck).
The ultimate filter for base-down applications is the Wix 51806 or equivalent; it's the big filter (like a 51515) but with a built-in nylon standpipe that prevents oil draining down thru the outlet, in addition to the ADBV that prevents oil draining down thru the inlet.