Even with it's 2.02 valve's and 170cc intake runner size
A 2.08 valve will fit a 318 block without a notch. 170cc is small for a 340/360.
Even with it's 2.02 valve's and 170cc intake runner size
Exactly my findings. I'm not a head porting wizard by any means, but at the time I bought these (knowing nothing about them beyond "Mopars" BS 300+ CFM claims in the catalog, I was working for SRE (Parent company to Trickflow and Total Engine Airflow) The kicker on Mopars flow rating (forget how I discovered this...maybe even called the tech line?) The Heads were flowed on a 4.125 bore. NOT the common 4.030 everyone would use. Mopar contracted crane to make the rockers, and crane went out of business....so no rockers.it would.
i found some old posts from @ou812 about the moved pushrod edelbrock variant heads and he seemed to really like getting the hump out of the int port to settle the flow even it didn't actually increase flow much at all. I'm talking about posts from 8-10 yrs ago though when there were alot less heads to run.
so at this point, these heads might make sense for some builds. they are about the same price as regular edelbrock heads now, mancini has rocker arms though they aren't listed on the site.
Since we're not too far apart, I'll keep you in mind if i ever have these off. Be neat to see how different they are, or aren't compared to the indybrocks, and the few other heads people compare them to.I don’t put a lot of stock in valve shrouding from what I’ve witnessed. My Edelbrock heads with the moved pushrod hit 332cfm on a the 4.015 bore size with a 2.08 valve. My other set without the pushrod moved hit 318. My 360-1 heads were tested on the same bore size even though they went on my 4.100 R3 block.
Yes! Absolutely!Even with it's 2.02 valve's and 170cc intake runner size