Captainkirk
Old School Mopar Warrior
@Jim Lusk Thank you for those excellent videos! Very much appreciated, and I notice your Harbor Freight press seems to work just fine!
Rubber in the lower control arm. Unless your using some method behind the torsion bar to stop the front and back movement of the control arm. sliding on and off the lubed up pin.
One thing to remember is these cars were not designed for the shock load of these newer stiff bushings, The frame and frame attachments are weak. This should be evident of all the welding shown on 72bluNblu parts above . Chrysler had a problem with the K-members cracking on cars with stabilizer bar cars on harsh road conditions. That is why they were reinforced on 70 -72 340 cars prior to the larger softer strut rod bushings.
Look at all the welds on this guys suspension above just to prevent this evident issue
Leave the engineered suspension the way it was designed for the street. I love these cars as light weight straight line cars. They were never meant to be canyon carvers. If you want to upgrade get a complete after market suspension with lower A-arms and a rack & pinion . Then add all the bracing US car tool sells.
Even when Chrysler redesigned the suspension in the later B-bodies and F -bodies they used large cushions to attach them to the frame to prevent shock to the unibody.
I may be old school at 70 years old but I have seen to many issues with these cars over the years. The lower poly / delrin style bushings are the worse thing you can add to these suspensions. I have seen guys put a plastic style shims/bushings behind the torsion bar and pin the bar forward to prevent the movement of lower shown above.
If you want to use poly delrin style go for it.
drive forward and hit the brakes to seat the control arm against the K-frame. Then back up and hit the brakes hard in reverse and look at how far they move away from the K-frame. I tried to show you all using the stiffest two piece bushing on the strut rod I have here that the strut rod does not prevent this movement as 72bluNblu states. I used a straight screwdriver to show the movement. And because I didn't pry it all the way back front. On No! I installed them wrong
Even with the torsion bar in place and the stiffest strut rod bushing, the lower can be moved easy front and back off the pin. Loading the bar means nothing because it unloads while driving. But he looks for reasons to make himself right. Like there is a special way to install the bushing that only he knows.
72bluNblu constantly states I am installing them wrong. How can you? They just push in with a little force . The lube is needed because without it they destroy themselves.
the most important thing to do when using OEM rubber style is to tighten the lower pin and upper eccentric bolts while the car is at ride height or they will tear from moving to far in one direction when letting it down and then driving it.
So its Rubber for me.
Well just more bullshit quotes. The torsion bar does not stay loaded when driving the car . And I proved that the strut rod does not hold the inside of the LCA buy having the tightest strut and TB in place and moving the arm on and off the pin. And that is with no swivel on an adjustable strut.
If you are so right about the strut on the outside holding the inside of the control arm. Then what you are saying is is we could all just take the torsion bars off and run coil overs and the lower control arm would just stay on that grease up pin. I met some pretty stupid people in my time. But you my friend take the cake.
If you welded up your k-member due to it being cracked before you installed it where are the welds on the rusted up piece of crap in the prior pictures. Even the dumbest person would have painted the fresh welds before reinstalling it. You just lie through your teeth to never admit your bullshit is wrong.
This is proof the strut rod doesn't hold anything. I know the first picture is not tight against. but these are while it twas already moved front to back completely assembled. The unloaded bar means nothing because the stiffer the bar the quicker it is in the neutral position on acceleration. Only weak /6 bars stay loaded through their travel. Why most use them for drag cars for lift to transfer weight. You are clueless. Your work is shoddy. and your car is a piece of crap you don't take care of.
Bushing on left a two piece style was used for the pictures. Can't get stiffer then those and they didn't hold **** to stop this movement. With the t-bar out I can slide it off the end of the pin. The strut rod does not hold nothing at the control bushing. and if you use and adjustable strut with a swivels its worse.
View attachment 1716442128
View attachment 1716442130
View attachment 1716442131
View attachment 1716442132
Potentially not while pulling a wheelie? You hang the suspension to remove the torsion bars, right, so would that not be a similar situation?In the car the torsion bar always has load on it dummy. ALWAYS.
Potentially not while pulling a wheelie? You hang the suspension to remove the torsion bars, right, so would that not be a similar situation?
Not trying to be a smart *** at all, because I'm not tracking OMM at all here, but I have often wondered about that scenario.
@Captainkirk , I'd also agree with Post 33 from @junkyardhero for your stated objectives
The main reason everyone uses the /6 bars on a drag car is they have continuous lift even when it reaches the upper bump stop.
The stronger the bar the less it is tensioned to have the car at ride height. So before it reaches the upper bump stop it runs out of tension. this is when the bar has no load. Same as when you crest a hill at higher speeds. when you lose the body weight you lose the tension.
I see this is way over your head Turk Turk. If I were you I would just admit you don't know what the hell you are talking about.
and i'll add to it, a lot of the 1/8th mile guys i know have since switched to running heavier bars to better control and tune the chassis. granted they're not dedicated race cars, but they're still damn fast cars that are street driven.I love it. Keep going you thief. You are exposing your ignorance. Again. And you are ******* people up with your bad advice. AGAIN.
That’s absolutely NOT the reason /6 bars are used. **** me running.
You use a LOWER SPRING RATE to get preload on the spring so it has some stored energy to help get the front of the car moving up.
You control that motion and its speed with the shocks.
You have no concept of spring rates, preload or chassis.
Moron
Stored energy means continuous pressure lifting to is max height. Shocks used are usually 90-10's and don't slow the lift rate . A stiffer bar has less lift travel. You are really making a fool of yourself. Do I need to send you the page out of the DC chassis manual? What does thievory have to do with anything I said ? I would quit while your behind. Turk Turk
View attachment 1716442221
and i'll add to it, a lot of the 1/8th mile guys i know have since switched to running heavier bars to better control and tune the chassis. granted they're not dedicated race cars, but they're still damn fast cars that are street driven.
for those of you still following along (i'm sorry).
but a point of reference: spring rate (t-bar size) and shocks will have more bearing and affect on ride quality than poly/delrin vs a rubber bushing.
shitty shocks give a shitty ride regardless of what the composition of the bushings happens to be.