Charrlie_S
Well-Known Member
Yep. Had .040 poured babbit rods. Had a guy turn the crank in the vehicle.The ol' babbit beater 6
Yep. Had .040 poured babbit rods. Had a guy turn the crank in the vehicle.The ol' babbit beater 6
She is a beauty.Thanks for the nice compliment on the Duster, and I like your taste in cars ( '64 slant six Dart). Two more pix, for your perusal. Enjoy!
View attachment 1716494647
View attachment 1716494648
She is feeling cold and lonely right now...I did a bunch of Hot Rod Power Tours with several cars. 2 were 67 Darts. One with a modified Slant and one bone stock. Just as much fun as any of the others.
Best was I had many folks liking my Slant cars. Latest project is a 72 Swinger Slant with A/C.
Hey I remember that SE. Got to drive it too. Some where I got photos of it in my driveway.
I’ve not even seen it and already want it. Probably a SM420 with unsynchronized low and first. I learned the skills of proper double clutching and float shifting from seat time in a ‘67 C30 with a 250-6 and that transmission. Those old GMC/ Chevrolet trucks make the best home for a bone stock base level 283 or 307 Chevy with an HEI ignition. Not a huge leap in power, but it allows for going up hill with a load in high gear. The fuel mileage is at least as good and usually better than the with the straight six. I’d love to have an early fifties GMC/Chevy cabover! It’s a whole different kind of “way back” machine.Most under powered vehicle I ever owned (forgot about it). 1952 Chevy 2 1/2 ton farm truck. Removed the hay bed, and put ramps on the back to carry my race car. Also towed my other race car behind (both 65 Valiants). Don't know the total weight. It would do about 50-60 mph downhill with a tail wind. 235 cid six cyl 96 Hp. 4 speed trans (Not OD) 6.xx rear gears.
PS: The engine was a splash oiler, where the con rods had "dippers" that scooped oil from troughs in the oil pan.
What about a later Buick motor? An L67 (supercharged 3800) ought to make that Jeepster move, if you're up for the wiring.Sometimes things run so well you don't want to change them. I have a 71 Jeepster Commando with a stock Dauntless V6 in it.
(Yes, it displaces 225 c.i. for those of you familiar with the Odd Fire Buick/Kaiser/AMC saga.)
I'm debating a 318 swap. Using aluminum heads to maintain a semblance of weight balance in a leaf spring vehicle.
And drilling the crank for a pilot bushing/bearing....What about a later Buick motor? An L67 (supercharged 3800) ought to make that Jeepster move, if you're up for the wiring.

So who is right here?
Good points. I would like to add hopefully for his wife/girlfriend (if he has one) he's not so quick to get to the finish line. Under 10 seconds really wouldn't be anything to be proud of. Lol.Shirley, you can't be serious.
There is no right/wrong here. Your car is yours, set up the way you like it. His car is his, set up the way he likes it. It does sound like he was being a dіck, carrying on as if he gets a vote on your car and trying to "prove" you "wrong" about whether you actually like driving your own car…which makes him seem real insecure. Add that to his big engine he swears is the biggest and bestest and loudest and bestest and fastest, and it all probably adds up to he's not getting laid and has some stuff he's trying to compensate for.
Why even engage with his idiotic argument?
I gotta come back and answer you directly.I need a tie breaker from my MoBros and MoSis' here. Last week I was at a meeting of my local Mopar club. While discussing the virtues of the stock slant six engine while simultaneously consuming a slice of pizza, another club guy challenged my assertion that driving an underpowered, underperforming car could be a lot of fun. His Mopar ride was a 440 GTX with a nitrous bottle, which gave him no end of driving entertainment. I on the other hand said that I just love driving my bone stock 1974 slant six Duster. Here's my take: My previous ride was a 440 powered '69 Charger R/T that had no problem pulling stumps out of the ground. But I also love driving the opposite end of the spectrum in a reliably underpowered car. Underpowered as in pulling 79 actual rear wheel horsepower on the chassis dyno. The Duster is an exercise in energy management - as in getting up to and staying at 70 on the interstate. I actually like that, and I don't know why. I just like it. We've all driven underpowered things - mini-bikes, tricycles, pony carts, etc. I maintain that a well rounded driver can enjoy everything in the full driving spectrum if you simply respect it for what it is. He thought this was complete BS, of course. So who is right here? I welcome all opinions here, and if you think I'm a complete nut job that's okay by me. Any tie breakers out there? Or worse, are there any other guys out there who actually enjoy driving underpowered cars and their energy management challenges? (PS: Attached are before and after photos of my Duster engine during its rebuild).
View attachment 1716494602
View attachment 1716494603
View attachment 1716494604
View attachment 1716494605
View attachment 1716494606
Shirley, you can't be serious.