No problem. I didn't know EFI was that early in anything. So I learnt sumffin. lolDisregard my comments on EFI as I thought we were talking about Imperials![]()
No problem. I didn't know EFI was that early in anything. So I learnt sumffin. lolDisregard my comments on EFI as I thought we were talking about Imperials![]()
No problem. I didn't know EFI was that early in anything. So I learnt sumffin. lol
Those V8-6-4 things were total junk. Now the 472 and 500....those were cool. There was a company that offered swap kits to put those in those little late 70s early 80s Malibus. Remember those? I knew a guy in Warner Robins that did one with a 500. It was an ex Macon PD car. Still had great paint on it. It was a total sleeper. When it finally hooked up, it would actually get somewhere.You know, Cadillac had something similar to that LBII contraption. I have forgotten what they called it. Or even the year(s) of it any more.
IIRC it was when I had my permit and not my license so that had to be 1978ish.
It was essentially a fuel injected carb. I can picture the thing in my mind but the detail is fading from my memory.
It was my aunts mother’s car. I remember it hitting 85k or something and that’s when the issues started cropping up.
I think it was close to the era of the V8-6-4 engine. Pretty sure that was a Caddy too.
Now I have to go look it up.
472 & 500.Hmm, I always thought the Cadillac’s displacement was 501ci, but a quick search provided this information;
“Many people look at the sticker under the hood and think the "501" is the engine size but it's not. If you look on that same sticker, you should see where it says "472cid"......or something to that extent. There was no Cadillac 501.”
I learn something new every day!
The one I want though is a Ford motor. Super Duty Gas. 534. They were in fire trucks and such from about 58-78. I want one of those bad boys. lol Better yet, the marine twin turbo version. The Seamaster 534 twin turbo......bitches. LOLHmm, I always thought the Cadillac’s displacement was 501ci, but a quick search provided this information;
“Many people look at the sticker under the hood and think the "501" is the engine size but it's not. If you look on that same sticker, you should see where it says "472cid"......or something to that extent. There was no Cadillac 501.”
I learn something new every day!
I had a 86' 5th Ave 318 and they called it a "Lean Burn". Never had a issue with it, for the 15 years I had it. The new owner took it off and the car never ran again. If it is not broke, don't fix it. If I recall correctly, it had the roller cam and got great mileage with its lock out convertor.^^^^Agree! 1982 would most likely be an electronic feedback carb with a second-gen Lean Burn... performance mods while retaining that system are nil to none.
Most people remove it, rewire and go to the standard Mopar electronic ignition and carb/manifold.
Sure, when they worked, they worked fine for their intended purpose. But just try getting any hard parts for them anymore, if needed.I had a 86' 5th Ave 318 and they called it a "Lean Burn". Never had a issue with it, for the 15 years I had it. The new owner took it off and the car never ran again. If it is not broke, don't fix it. If I recall correctly, it had the roller cam and got great mileage with its lock out convertor.