what are you running for a cam in that? something like this is what I'd like to eventually put in my duster with my A833OD/3.23's/27" tall tires...though I am smitten by the Aussiespeed Hurricane long runner manifold....I'd be looking for idle-5000 RPM performance....was originally thinking 2bbl, but a small 4bbl might actually be more economical in cruise with the smaller primaries....not much in the way of progressive 2bbls out there....If it helps your thought process...
The slant in my truck is a low-to-middlin' build. About 8.2 compresssion, oversize valves, head cut .060 with a light pocket port job. Offy 4-barrel with an AVS2 500 carb, Clifford shorties to a single 2.5" exhaust. 833OD with 3.55 gears and 28" tires. It will very much get up and go if you want it to, even in a heavy non-aerodynamic vehicle. YMMV of course, but this thing is a hoot to drive.
It is an Oregon Cam SFT regrind, #2106. 214/210 @.050, 444/434 lift, 108 LSA.what are you running for a cam in that?
Isn't that one of Dutra's reverse grinds?It is an Oregon Cam SFT regrind, #2106. 214/210 @.050, 444/434 lift, 108 LSA.
Correct!Isn't that one of Dutra's reverse grinds?
So You already have this Cifford package? If so, it is a very good setup, it will accomodate basically stock to a pretty good level of modifications. It's just a shame Jack Clifford's business fell into a 'less-than Car Guy''s hands to oversee. That may or may not be improving, if You had no issues ordering & receiving those items, it might be.The set up i went with came from clifford performance which included headers. So I hear ya
what's the theory for less exhaust duration compared to intake duration for the slant? seems counter to pretty much everything you see cam wise nowadays?Isn't that one of Dutra's reverse grinds?
I believe he was thinking the intake flowed that well over the exhaust and the exhaust didn't need the extra help. But in testing, they found that those grinds didn't make any more appreciable power than a conventional design. They didn't make less either. At least that's what I've READ. If someone else knows more or something different, please post it.what's the theory for less exhaust duration compared to intake duration for the slant? seems counter to pretty much everything you see cam wise nowadays?
That’s due to the severely limited intake port on the slant. The head was designed for 170 cubic inches with a short stroke, and was originally designed in aluminum. That means huge coolant passages but not a lot of room for porting and reshaping the port before you get into water.what's the theory for less exhaust duration compared to intake duration for the slant? seems counter to pretty much everything you see cam wise nowadays?
It does cost, for sure. That's why I do everything I can for machine work here at home. I can enlarge spring pockets, knurl guides as long as they aren't real sloppy, install cam bearings and freeze plugs. I can also check for cracks. I can also do very basic valve jobs if the valves and seats don't need grinding. I've been looking at valve and seat grinders, though.Once you get into machining and cams, you're also into a ton of money.
I had the best luck with a stock cast iron 2 barrel manifold and a 2 barrel carb from a 318. Peppy and on the cheap. Slightly improved mpg and way more responsive throttle.
Machining is nice but it's expensive and these days good machine shops are rare so they can charge what they want.
I have seen quite a few 2 barrel setups come up for sure.
Then I was thinking the other way around. Thanks.That’s due to the severely limited intake port on the slant. The head was designed for 170 cubic inches with a short stroke, and was originally designed in aluminum. That means huge coolant passages but not a lot of room for porting and reshaping the port before you get into water.
Doug was the forefather of Reverse Dual Pattern cam testing in the slant six world. He swears by them but I haven’t seen anything showing hp gains or losses over a traditional grind.
It’s a lot of theory in my opinion but definitely an interesting read. I’ve had a Doug built motor with one of his RDP cams installed and it was a well mannered and sweet running slant!Then I was thinking the other way around. Thanks.
Yeah. Sometimes the paper doesn't tell the whole story.It’s a lot of theory in my opinion but definitely an interesting read. I’ve had a Doug built motor with one of his RDP cams installed and it was a well mannered and sweet running slant!
Can you share the details on your Dutra motor?It’s a lot of theory in my opinion but definitely an interesting read. I’ve had a Doug built motor with one of his RDP cams installed and it was a well mannered and sweet running slant!
Lsa on that cam was 98 installed at 92.I have been using reverse pattern cams for years. Jon Kaase won the engine masters contest with a RP cam. He was very naughty: used very short conrods; used very tight LSA cam, 92 LSA.
View attachment 1716475415
View attachment 1716475416
Show me one test, any kind of comparative data where a reverse split was tested against a similar traditional split pattern cam and it makes more power. I’ll wait.It really is nonsense to claim as a blanket statement that RP cams do not work. In the same EMC contest that Jon Kaase won, post #65, He also had a 429 Ford entry that had a RP cam, 264/256 @ 050. He came 5th out of 29 entries listed in the results in PHR magazine in Feb 2009. His engine recorded the highest hp, 746, of those listed.
A recent trend has been to use lower ratio rockers on the exh. If the cam is a single pattern, you are effectively converting to a RP cam, acknowledging that the extra lift & duration is not needed.
It’s been a few years but it was a true 9:1, Dutra oiling mods and blueprinted pump, rdp15(?) cam and the head was ported/polished/gasket match. Offy 4 bbl with eddy 500 and OG Dutra duals y’d into a single. Nice bottom end but kinda breathless above 5k.Can you share the details on your Dutra motor?
I don't see his slant 6.I have been using reverse pattern cams for years. Jon Kaase won the engine masters contest with a RP cam. He was very naughty: used very short conrods; used very tight LSA cam, 92 LSA.
View attachment 1716475415
View attachment 1716475416
What's nonsense is, you bringin your bullcrap in here when the only engines we were discussing reverse cams on was a SLANT 6. Go take your chit somewhere else.It really is nonsense to claim as a blanket statement that RP cams do not work. In the same EMC contest that Jon Kaase won, post #65, He also had a 429 Ford entry that had a RP cam, 264/256 @ 050. He came 5th out of 29 entries listed in the results in PHR magazine in Feb 2009. His engine recorded the highest hp, 746, of those listed.
A recent trend has been to use lower ratio rockers on the exh. If the cam is a single pattern, you are effectively converting to a RP cam, acknowledging that the extra lift & duration is not needed.
The answer has been given many times in this thread. Read.And do they work on a slant 6?