I got one of these for cleaning them for reuse...
looks handy~!
I got one of these for cleaning them for reuse...
I told ya I was feeling like I had my energy back! LOL!Jeezz!
It would have been even funnier if it was called "spludgeboy" cleanerI told ya I was feeling like I had my energy back! LOL!

Handy? I like handies!looks handy~!
so - is friction your friend or your enemy... ??Get the ribbed ones and turn them inside out for YOUR pleasure!
Just don't buy the cheap retreads...they can fly apart at high speeds!
View attachment 1715009206
Riiight!so - is friction your friend or your enemy... ??![]()
nice! so no contact from the engine builder huh?So I have an appointment to take Dart to a Chassis Dyno on tuesday! Will post of course
Custom Dyno Tuning
Nope. Na Da. I really just want to know what this mill is putting to the ground. It seems real quick.nice! so no contact from the engine builder huh?
Ok, this should be good! I'm guessing 350-375 hp at the rear wheels.So I have an appointment to take Dart to a Chassis Dyno on tuesday! Will post of course
Custom Dyno Tuning
Why the difference?Oh wait, it's a Mustang dyno not a Dynojet.
325-350 hp at the wheels
fun to bang through the gears for sure - the full manual AT is a hootNope. Na Da. I really just want to know what this mill is putting to the ground. It seems real quick.
- I recently discovered that I am actually losing a little RWHP due to the Ford 9" and 4.10's - or at least, that's what I was told...9 inch ford is darn near bullet proof but parasitic.fun to bang through the gears for sure - the full manual AT is a hoot- I recently discovered that I am actually losing a little RWHP due to the Ford 9" and 4.10's - or at least, that's what I was told...
Mustang dynos operate on a different principal which generally reads 10%+ lower HP than the Dynojet. The Mustang adds load beyond the roller weight and is supposed to simulate the real road conditions better...but it is hotly debated across many forums as to which is better (or more accurate).Why the difference?
that's what I have been hearing.. I do have an 8.75... it would be a bunch of work to go back in a car that has been converted.. but it might be worth looking into.9 inch ford is darn near bullet proof but parasitic.
Thank you for the education.Mustang dynos operate on a different principal which generally reads 10%+ lower HP than the Dynojet. The Mustang adds load beyond the roller weight and is supposed to simulate the real road conditions better...but it is hotly debated across many forums as to which is better (or more accurate).
Truth is that Chassis Dynos are just a measurement tool to compare 'before and after' for modifications or tuning and aren't really meant to give a true measurement of actual HP to the ground. Time slips are better for that. The chassis dyno just gives you another data point for comparison and evaluation.
That would be respectful but im Guessing a little higher on HP and torque. Low 12'sMy best guess (without any data to base it on other than cam and carb) is 342 RWHP @ 5500 rpm, 372 lb-ft torque at 4300 rpm.
Best 1/4 mi ET estimate...12.8 sec
I'm just tossing it out to see how close I get...![]()
So throw out your guess! You've driven it so take a stab at it and see how close you get to the dyno numbers!That would be respectful but im Guessing a little higher on HP and torque. Low 12's
Cool! Now lets see if anyone else has a guess and then we will see what the numbers say on Tuesday!350 HP and 396 Ft Lb torque, at same RPM as stated by Ddaddy. At the wheels.
It feels like 400 HP but I am realistic.

I will have to reschedule if it is raining hard here. Might be. This engine was assembled by Boggess Performance Racing Engines | Facebook and 12grand was put into the engine build, per receipts.Cool! Now lets see if anyone else has a guess and then we will see what the numbers say on Tuesday!
![]()