Stop in for a cup of coffee

-
ScampMike said:
cool stuff - the main ramp/1/2 pipe at Zero Gravity was at least 40' wide and had to be 30' high... it was actually hard to ride because it felt slow but you were going SO fast - once you got a feel for it - it was SICK
Click to expand...

I was never a huge fan of half pipes, i like grinding rails and ledges personally! But there is a massive/deep bowl at Lynch that goes probably 15-20ft deep on one corner.

well off to work, nice talking to you all!
 
halifaxhops said:
Man this election recount thing pisses me off. Isn't it over when one concedes? Typical Clinton move.
Click to expand...
yes, and yes. Wont change anything..... there's no way to verfiy if a vote was switched even if there was evidence of tracking.
 
Expire said:
I was never a huge fan of half pipes, i like grinding rails and ledges personally! But there is a massive/deep bowl at Lynch that goes probably 15-20ft deep on one corner.

well off to work, nice talking to you all!
Click to expand...
ya'all come on back now ya hear!?
 
Expire said:
I was never a huge fan of half pipes, i like grinding rails and ledges personally! But there is a massive/deep bowl at Lynch that goes probably 15-20ft deep on one corner.

well off to work, nice talking to you all!
Click to expand...
I spent way too much time with the whole pipe to do anything with a half pipe..
 
dukeboy_318 said:
yes, and yes. Wont change anything..... there's no way to verfiy if a vote was switched even if there was evidence of tracking.
Click to expand...
So, I heard they want recounts... but on what grounds? and is there a scenario that would actually change the outcome? What is there to recount anyway? Isn't most of it done electronically?
 
zkx14 said:
So, I heard they want recounts... but on what grounds? and is there a scenario that would actually change the outcome? What is there to recount anyway? Isn't most of it done electronically?
Click to expand...

Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate who received just one percent of the vote, called for a recount. Hillary Clinton has joined the movement as well. Liberals would have you believe that this is all being done fir the purpose of “preserving the integrity” of the system. But don’t be fooled- there is a completely different reason for this call for the recount.

The real reason for this is to tie up the electoral votes long enough in order to nullify the electoral votes of Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.

Federal law says that presidential recounts must be completed within 35 days after an election. Stein waited until 90 minutes before the Wisconsin deadline for filing a recount petition expired.

All the votes have to be certified by December 13 according to a report on Friday. The electors meet on December 19.

Wisconsin will almost certainly miss that deadline, since the last recount took more than a month. And that recount was for a state Supreme Court contest where only 1.5 million votes were cast.

If Wisconsin misses the December 19 deadline, the electoral votes may not be counted.

On top of that, hitting the Dec. 13 deadline will be virtually impossible if Stein is able to force the recount to be conducted by hand, Wisconsin’s top election official said.

This is so blatantly CORRUPT! No wonder Hillary is all over this garbage.

Robert Gehl at Federalist Papers reports that she’s also making the same move in Michigan and Pennsylvania. Force a recount that would be almost impossible to complete in time for the electors to count.

So what happens when the electors meet on Dec. 19 in their respective state capitols and those three states aren’t represented? Then Trump only gets 260 electoral college votes – ten less than the majority needed.

[What happens then?] The American Thinker gives us the answer:

Then this goes to Congress, where the House voting 1 vote per state elects Trump, and Senate selects Pence. This would be first time this happened since 1824, but in that case, John Quincy Adams won in the House, though he had fewer electoral college votes than Andrew Jackson. If this goes to the US House and Senate, and the result is the same as result from the Electoral College without the recounts, why do it? The answer is to make Trump seem even more illegitimate, that he did not win the popular vote (he lost by over 2.1 million), he did not win the Electoral College (did not reach 270), and was elected by being inserted into the presidency by members of his own party in Congress.
Greater forces are at work here. Nefarious forces that will do anything to undermine not only the future president, but the integrity of the American election system.
 
zkx14 said:
So, I heard they want recounts... but on what grounds? and is there a scenario that would actually change the outcome? What is there to recount anyway? Isn't most of it done electronically?
Click to expand...
See below:

MOPARMITCH said:
Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate who received just one percent of the vote, called for a recount. Hillary Clinton has joined the movement as well. Liberals would have you believe that this is all being done fir the purpose of “preserving the integrity” of the system. But don’t be fooled- there is a completely different reason for this call for the recount.

The real reason for this is to tie up the electoral votes long enough in order to nullify the electoral votes of Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.

Federal law says that presidential recounts must be completed within 35 days after an election. Stein waited until 90 minutes before the Wisconsin deadline for filing a recount petition expired.

All the votes have to be certified by December 13 according to a report on Friday. The electors meet on December 19.

Wisconsin will almost certainly miss that deadline, since the last recount took more than a month. And that recount was for a state Supreme Court contest where only 1.5 million votes were cast.

If Wisconsin misses the December 19 deadline, the electoral votes may not be counted.

On top of that, hitting the Dec. 13 deadline will be virtually impossible if Stein is able to force the recount to be conducted by hand, Wisconsin’s top election official said.

This is so blatantly CORRUPT! No wonder Hillary is all over this garbage.

Robert Gehl at Federalist Papers reports that she’s also making the same move in Michigan and Pennsylvania. Force a recount that would be almost impossible to complete in time for the electors to count.

So what happens when the electors meet on Dec. 19 in their respective state capitols and those three states aren’t represented? Then Trump only gets 260 electoral college votes – ten less than the majority needed.

[What happens then?] The American Thinker gives us the answer:

Then this goes to Congress, where the House voting 1 vote per state elects Trump, and Senate selects Pence. This would be first time this happened since 1824, but in that case, John Quincy Adams won in the House, though he had fewer electoral college votes than Andrew Jackson. If this goes to the US House and Senate, and the result is the same as result from the Electoral College without the recounts, why do it? The answer is to make Trump seem even more illegitimate, that he did not win the popular vote (he lost by over 2.1 million), he did not win the Electoral College (did not reach 270), and was elected by being inserted into the presidency by members of his own party in Congress.
Greater forces are at work here. Nefarious forces that will do anything to undermine not only the future president, but the integrity of the American election system.

“Sometimes doing your best is not good enough. Sometimes you must do what is required.” —Sir Winston Churchill “Unless you try to do something beyond what you have already mastered, you will never grow.” ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson
“I shall be telling this with a sigh..Somewhere ages and ages hence: Two roads diverged in a wood, and I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference”. Robert Frost
Click to expand...
 

MOPARMITCH said:
Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate who received just one percent of the vote, called for a recount. Hillary Clinton has joined the movement as well. Liberals would have you believe that this is all being done fir the purpose of “preserving the integrity” of the system. But don’t be fooled- there is a completely different reason for this call for the recount.

The real reason for this is to tie up the electoral votes long enough in order to nullify the electoral votes of Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.

Federal law says that presidential recounts must be completed within 35 days after an election. Stein waited until 90 minutes before the Wisconsin deadline for filing a recount petition expired.

All the votes have to be certified by December 13 according to a report on Friday. The electors meet on December 19.

Wisconsin will almost certainly miss that deadline, since the last recount took more than a month. And that recount was for a state Supreme Court contest where only 1.5 million votes were cast.

If Wisconsin misses the December 19 deadline, the electoral votes may not be counted.

On top of that, hitting the Dec. 13 deadline will be virtually impossible if Stein is able to force the recount to be conducted by hand, Wisconsin’s top election official said.

This is so blatantly CORRUPT! No wonder Hillary is all over this garbage.

Robert Gehl at Federalist Papers reports that she’s also making the same move in Michigan and Pennsylvania. Force a recount that would be almost impossible to complete in time for the electors to count.

So what happens when the electors meet on Dec. 19 in their respective state capitols and those three states aren’t represented? Then Trump only gets 260 electoral college votes – ten less than the majority needed.

[What happens then?] The American Thinker gives us the answer:

Then this goes to Congress, where the House voting 1 vote per state elects Trump, and Senate selects Pence. This would be first time this happened since 1824, but in that case, John Quincy Adams won in the House, though he had fewer electoral college votes than Andrew Jackson. If this goes to the US House and Senate, and the result is the same as result from the Electoral College without the recounts, why do it? The answer is to make Trump seem even more illegitimate, that he did not win the popular vote (he lost by over 2.1 million), he did not win the Electoral College (did not reach 270), and was elected by being inserted into the presidency by members of his own party in Congress.
Greater forces are at work here. Nefarious forces that will do anything to undermine not only the future president, but the integrity of the American election system.
Click to expand...
:wtf::wtf::wtf: That's about all I can say in response without pushing this conversation to N P... OK, one more -:wtf:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
-

Similar threads

E
ESPO Springs n Things
Replies
16
Views
294
RustyRatRod
RustyRatRod
ocdart
Bye, bye Parnelli...there's a spot on the front row waiting for you
Replies
9
Views
568
Sublime one
Sublime one
Johnny Mac
Stop in and see BluePrint Engines at Carlisle 2025! First time attending! Show Specials :)
Replies
8
Views
704
Johnny Mac
Johnny Mac
340six
Interested in a different type of build thread
Replies
3
Views
233
340six
340six
HawkRod
2025 Carlisle FxBO Tent Luncheon
2
Replies
26
Views
2K
Kern Dog
Kern Dog
Back
Top Bottom