Just sayin'
The website didn't say that I could find but they said the results were within 5% of real world Dyno horsepower. It's fun to mess around regardless of what the numbers are.What you really want is SAE net flywheel HP. Drive train losses are too inconsistent to model and expect them to be accurate.
Nope, just a little spill over from the meme thread. Thought you might get a chuckle.N.P. ..................


Wow! That sure was fast. We're at 42 here and 90 percent of our 6 inches is gone. Only the shaded spots does any snow remain. But they're saying we're going to get another round tomorrow nightWell, the clean up after this storm was a breeze. I went out around 10 am and made a few cuts across the driveway with a shovel and let the sun do the rest. By 5 pm it was all melted, even the stuff the plows put across the driveway. 47* with late March sunshine plus a 15 mph breeze made short work of it.
You know, I've never seen that movieNope, just a little spill over from the meme thread. Thought you might get a chuckle.![]()
And we are supposed to get 6+ inches of snow Sat. nite. I callWow! That sure was fast. We're at 42 here and 90 percent of our 6 inches is gone. Only the shaded spots does any snow remain. But they're saying we're going to get another round tomorrow night
.Me too. We'll see.And we are supposed to get 6+ inches of snow Sat. nite. I call.
Someplace I've seen, and maybe saved, an explanation of how advertised Hp ratings were done by the manufacturers. The method changed several times (not talking about fudging part of it, just what the standard method was within the industry). NHRA had their own method...The website didn't say that I could find but they said the results were within 5% of real world Dyno horsepower. It's fun to mess around regardless of what the numbers are.
Cool. I'll go get my laptoSomeplace I've seen, and maybe saved, an explanation of how advertised Hp ratings were done by the manufacturers. The method changed several times (not talking about fudging part of it, just what the standard method was within the industry). NHRA had their own method...
Anyway, I agree - the drivetrain factors make it hard to compare. Lets see what Mike did vs what I did (and anyone else too) because someplace my info in must be garbage.
The original measurements were done as gross HP using engines without accessories, drive belts, etc using header type manifolds. By 1971 they all switched to using the SAE net HP requirements after California made it a Law that they couldn’t advertise HP unless it was done by the SAE method.Someplace I've seen, and maybe saved, an explanation of how advertised Hp ratings were done by the manufacturers. The method changed several times (not talking about fudging part of it, just what the standard method was within the industry). NHRA had their own method...
Anyway, I agree - the drivetrain factors make it hard to compare. Lets see what Mike did vs what I did (and anyone else too) because someplace my info in must be garbage.
You forgot the intake...
Seems to, but the exhaust smells like potato chips!Nice it holds right?
Yep do you blame them? Under promise and over deliverThe interesting thing is that the modern certified SAE net HP rating that everyone uses requires an SAE observer to be present when the randomly pull a car off the assembly line and do the test. The manufacturer is then allowed to claim a HP rating that is +/- 1% of the measured value.
Chrysler, beginning with the Viper, has consistently claimed the lower number because they say that they would rather have customers getting more HP than claimed rather than less on an average basis.
Should get the popcorn flavored then!Seems to, but the exhaust smells like potato chips!
It’s just interesting that Chrysler has chosen to go with the lower number when many other manufacturers are using the higher number.Yep do you blame them? Under promise and over deliver
That’s a different tube...Should get the popcorn flavored then!