Stop in for a cup of coffee

-
pressure treated, I did use trex for top rail, but not a fan for anything structural. Very hot under bare feet in the sun and needs a lot of support or spans will warp.
2017-05-17 07.55.31.jpg
 
Ok I'm not a real engine guru like you guys, so excuse my ignorance. My question, I thought (told by PO) when they switched the engine to EFI, and by-passed the ballast you no longer needed to worry about the ballast??
define efi! You mean fuel injection or ignition?
 
If you want to learn a bit about ballast resistors here's a article about them. Ballast Resistor Guide - Ballast Blast-Off - Mopar Muscle Magazine
Nice article! Pretty much explains it way better than I can
Good adventure on a score roll again today, Pick up smokes the rep is there gives me coupons for 4 off a pack, then stop by Keiters farm junkyard just to drop off some old tools I had for the wall of his new shop, well might have a 50's Packard TBD have to look at it supposed to be a hemi drove by it a lot looks ok just have to see how it really is. I need to play the lottery for sure this week! daughter bought brunch, had a good time at the yard also! Winn win for all!
 
Nice article! Pretty much explains it way better than I can
Good adventure on a score roll again today, Pick up smokes the rep is there gives me coupons for 4 off a pack, then stop by Keiters farm junkyard just to drop off some old tools I had for the wall of his new shop, well might have a 50's Packard TBD have to look at it supposed to be a hemi drove by it a lot looks ok just have to see how it really is. I need to play the lottery for sure this week! daughter bought brunch, had a good time at the yard also! Winn win for all!
Yep you need to buy a lottery ticket!
 
Was hoping to see what he did to get his EFI In a small block...Electronic FUEL Injection.
 
Oh one more they have a slant six combine coming in might have a aluminum engine, asked if I want it? :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
If that car was mine, the Polara, No way it does not get a 440 or 383 in it. Just my thoughts....
 
ive thought about using EFI on the poly.
Lots of choices nowdays. They work well. Heck, I had the old analog Holley system on my tool truck 10 or so years ago. It worked well. I liked it because all the adjustments were on the control box under the dash.
 
Lots of choices nowdays. They work well. Heck, I had the old analog Holley system on my tool truck 10 or so years ago. It worked well. I liked it because all the adjustments were on the control box under the dash.
problem is the money involved.
 
If you want to learn a bit about ballast resistors here's a article about them. Ballast Resistor Guide - Ballast Blast-Off - Mopar Muscle Magazine

Nice article! Pretty much explains it way better than I can

Agree but they really are misleading people into running without a ballast resistor when they should. :(
"Quite simply, if your distributor has breaker points the answer is yes; if not, the answer is no."
:eek:

They also skip how it works - cooling off at higher speed thus allowing more current at higher rpm, and that compensates for less time available to saturate. This is right out of the Chrysler tech bulletin on pages 4-5
Ignition System Analysis 1969
And again in the era electronic ignitions
"This protects the ignition coil against high current flow at low engine speeds"
from 1972 MTSC Ignition Service (Session 292)

If it wasn't needed, Chrysler and Ford would have saved a heck of a lot of money. LOL. GM's HEI module controls the current. Can't tell you how many guys on the IFSJA forum had problems after following the 'hot tip' for swapping in a "TFI Coil" and bypassing the resistor wire. Works for bit, and then it doesn't.

"In their electronic ignition systems Chrysler utilized a dual ballast resistor,"
Only partially correct. Single ballasts were also used.
The dual resistor was to protect the ECUs as explained on this page
1973 Chrysler Electronic Ignition Diagnosis and Repair (Session 312)
So removing a the ballast resistor on those Chrysler boxes will send them to an early grave. I'm sure the magazine will give those owners a refund :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Agree but they really are misleading people into running without a ballast resistor when they should. :(
"Quite simply, if your distributor has breaker points the answer is yes; if not, the answer is no.":eek:
They also skip how it works - cooling off at higher speed thus allowing more current at higher rpm, and that compensates for less time available to saturate. This is right out of the Chrysler tech bulletins.
Ignition System Analysis (Session 259) from the Master Technician's Service Conference Explained on pages 4-5.
And again in the era electronic ignitions
"This protects the ignition coil against high current flow at low engine speeds" 1972 Imperial & Chrysler Ignition System Service Book (Session 292)

If it wasn't needed, Chrysler and Ford whould have saved a heck of a lot of money. LOL. GM's HEI module controls the current. Can't tell you how many guys on the IFSJA forum had problems after following the 'hot tip' for swapping in a "TFI Coil" and bypassing the resistor wire. Works for bit, and then it doesn't.

"In their electronic ignition systems Chrysler utilized a dual ballast resistor,"
Only partially correct. Single ballasts were also used.
The dual resistor was to protect the ECUs.
1973 Chrysler and Imperial Electronic Ignition Diagnosis and Repair Service Book from the Master Technician's Service Conference (Session 312)
So removing a the ballast resistor on those Chrysler boxes will send them to an early grave. I'm sure the magazine will give those owners a refund :rolleyes:
True that. Many don't know about the resistance changes with coil temp/time and the purpose behind the design.
 
The most important thing it does is reduce the voltage to the points/coil to prevent arcing and extend life. 6 volt systems didn't need resistors.
 
-
Back
Top