hard combo to beat!Agreed, I run a 360 cast iron spreadbore on my 318 head (1.74/150) Power-Wagon.
hard combo to beat!Agreed, I run a 360 cast iron spreadbore on my 318 head (1.74/150) Power-Wagon.
How come the pistons have to be flat tops? I'd say that you have tons of experience and knowledge.NO SIR............Wrong!
YOU MUST run 1.5 rockers and not a thousand more (They may be UNDER
but not OVER!
The pistons must be Flat tops without any Valve notches unlike the earlier 318 pistons
that had 4 notches.
With the small 1.78/1.50 stock heads the begin to flow Less over .400 lift anyway! Besides
which they will crash the valve into the piston much over that lift anyway with the engine blueprinted
to correct deck and head CCs!
I have been racing stock/SS cars for well over 60 years and help at the track for over
70 years. I keep very current on the rules and we have been torn down dozens of time
and always found legal. We are not popular with the small block GM and Ford guys we compete
against and beat regularly.
BTW: We spend $100,000.00 plus Researching/Developing and
Racing these cars every single year for decades. I am pretty reliable if
I tell you anything I have found out despite my detractors on this site.
430 to 440 will get it done if you have a decent torque curve andHowSounds like you have a well set up car. Doesn't it take 500-550 horsepower at the flywheel to get a 4,000 pound car into the 11's?
Pushing 80 and still turning wrenches, that's awesome. I figured that you would have to run a stock transmission and convertor430 to 440 will get it done if you have a decent torque curve andHow
optimal everything else. Just the Pro Trans and converter alone are
$10,000 plus.
However, I am pushing 80 and I have never seen a U Haul trailer on
the back of a Hearse. In Heaven the streets are paved with Gold and
I will not need to funds to buy anything~
Brings up a questionfactory cast iron 4bbl is a great manifold. edelbrock performer (just the plain ol' performer) is a fantastic upgrade.
both are plentiful and affordable and you can retain all of your factory things and stuffs.
carb keep it small, 500~625 carter/edelbrock afb or AVS2, or a small holley with vacuum secondaries.
the linkage and kick down stuff is important, search around and you'll see many threads on how to convert.
i think so. if anything you *might* need to tweak the choke rod for distance/clearance, but i doubt it.Brings up a question
I have a standard performer, not air gap or rpm, anything like that. It has a factory style choke well on it. Can I run a TQ. With a factory choke on the performer?
In terms of the 1970s LA? the cam. Not so much that it would run like crap there just wouldnt be much of a performance gain. I could see doing it though especially if the 2 barrel was just worn out . Id even run a small 4 barrel maybe smaller than 600 CFM.Why would a four barrel make a 318 run like crap? Even if otherwise stock?
Heck, Chrysler Corp put four barrel carbs on 273s. And two four barrel carbs on 318 poly motors in 57-58 Plymouth Furies.
500 cfm AVS 2 on an otherwise stock 56 Plymouth 277 poly (factory four barrel motor):
View attachment 1716503653
The cam in my 56 Plymouth 277 only has .380 lift, same as the 2 barrel 277. CR is only 8 to 1. A hi-po 273 does have a higher CR than a 2-barrel 273, but only has a 248 degree camIn terms of the 1970s LA? the cam. Not so much that it would run like crap there just wouldnt be much of a performance gain. I could see doing it though especially if the 2 barrel was just worn out . Id even run a small 4 barrel maybe smaller than 600 CFM.
Like in all the 318 hop up threads, A 4 barrel, a proper distributor advance curve, and dual exhaust are the first 3 things to do before a cam and headers. You may be so pleased with the performance there will be no need to go any further. Then comes a converter and rear gears. A little compression can help with performance any time along the way, but pistons or cylinder heads are needed for that. I could go on with that subject but we don't need to go there in a 2-4 barrel thread.The cam in my 56 Plymouth 277 only has .380 lift, same as the 2 barrel 277. CR is only 8 to 1. A hi-po 273 does have a higher CR than a 2-barrel 273, but only has a 248 degree cam
Chevy and Ford small motors ( 265/283, the Ford Y blocks and the early 260/289s) all had mild cams.
All manufacturers optionally offered 4-barrel carbs on these mild cammed small motors.
No, a four barrel alone won't make a 318 a hot rod, but there would be a definite 15-25 hp performance improvement. Whether you think that's worth doing is something you would have to decide.
For whatever it's worth here, I've attached a couple of photos. One is of the factory 360 in my '79 Dodge van with A/C and the other is the factory 318 in my '87 Dodge Pickup with A/C.
Looks like they both have the offset thermostat housing to clear the A/C pump.
I'd also like to put a 4 Barrel on my pickup, and possibly an RV cam for towing, though I don't really want to tear into the engine too much as it's only got a little over 40k original miles on it. I used the truck once last year to tow my Barracuda 100 miles to the Mopar Showdown. It definitely lacked power but I may also be using my newly acquired 79 Dodge modified van with the 360 4 barrel as my future tow rig.
View attachment 1716503699
View attachment 1716503701
View attachment 1716503725
That '87 Pickup Carbureted 318 should be the roller cam engine. Already set up with the fuel pump and eccentric in the timing chain cover.
9.2:1 cr with flat top pistons .040 ths down in the hole, with the 302 closed chamber heads and roller cam valve train. Factory 230 hp engine, and that's with the 2 bbl.
Those factory roller cams do great for low end torque after adding the 4 bbl, and they won't float the valves on the upper rpm range with the roller valve train and factory roller valve springs.
Just needs some more fuel.
Then the whole tone of the engine deepens with a nice tone out the single 2.5" exhaust pipe too.
Big large port cast iron exhaust manifolds (same exhaust manifolds as used on the 360 truck engines), so it will breathe good non-restricted.
Truck LAs '88 through '91 (318) and '92 (360) were roller-cammed LAs with TBI injection until '91/'92 after which they were superseded by the Magnum series.Not to hijack this thread, but I believe in '87, the pickups were still the LA engine, from what I've researched. A whopping 150hp with the 318 2 barrel.
Just for a sidenote, I had a 89 Dodge van with a 360 TBI that was roller cam.Truck LAs '88-'91 (318) and '92 (360) were roller-cammed LAs with TBI injection systems, superseded in '91/'92 by the Magnum series.
Passenger car carbureted 318s got roller cams even earlier, like in '85/'86 ish.
Yeah, I generally include vans under the "truck" category.Just for a sidenote, I had a 89 Dodge van with a 360 TBI that was roller cam. Also, first year for the Magnum was in 92 for the 318 and 93 for the 360.
Brings up a question
I have a standard performer, not air gap or rpm, anything like that. It has a factory style choke well on it. Can I run a TQ. With a factory choke on the performer?
All the Performer intakes I've seen are square bore.
Did they make a spread bore version?
TQ has way too big secondary bores to fit on a square bore flange.
I would work that plenum and leave the "dividers" exposed below the mounting flange. [edit] I'm referring to the Street Master single plane. My apologies.With the stock cam, the SP2P with a 650 AVS2 is a really happy combination on a stock early eighties 318 truck.
Part number please?
All the Performer intakes I've seen are square bore.
Did they make a spread bore version?
TQ has way too big secondary bores to fit on a square bore flange.