318 std piston quench with aluminum heads?

[340inabbody]

Guys, would I get any decent quench or any at all running std 1970 318 pistons with a newer aluminum head? I know the 318’s are a lower compression and the plug sits below deck like 20 thou or so. Or is that a bad combination?

The old heads I believe are open chamber?? and one question I have is are all the aluminum performance heads closed chamber?


Just kicking around some ideas.

 

[GTX JOHN]

The 318 pistons are generally 50 or 60 down
in the hole or more (Blueprint Spec is 41). Some 318 heads are closed
and some are open chamber. That low of compression would not be optimal
although it would operate OK. I would try to choose a head that was lower in CCs
if available or plan to take a .050 cut off of it.

I have race this engine in NHRA stock for many years and I am pretty familiar with it.

 

[junkyardhero]

not really, no.

better, yes. but not "optimal".

 

[340inabbody]

Eddy’s. 63cc
Trickflow 60cc
Speedmaster 65cc

Is there a calculation for quench or is it strictly the volume of the quench area?

Assuming original compression ratio of 8.6 stock heads is there a way to compare the above heads for quench volume or how ever it’s quantified? Same for compression?

 

[Professor Fate]

I wouldn't even worry about it.
Generally accepted clearances generally put effective quench at something approaching .035- if your stock pistons are .050-.060 down like GTX John says, I don't think there's any chance for you to get anywhere near that number; let alone when you throw a .028-.042 ish head gasket on it.
I think you're chasing your tail with a stock piston and deck height.

 

[340inabbody]

Thanks was just kicking some ideas around. I have a nice stock 318 short block that I was thinking of using either temporarily or a little longer than that.