That could be. I think the poly has exhaust, intake,E,I,E,I,E,I and the LA has E,I,I,E,E,I,I,EIsnt it just a few lobes are exhaust instead of intake? But the cam core is the same?
That could be. I think the poly has exhaust, intake,E,I,E,I,E,I and the LA has E,I,I,E,E,I,I,EIsnt it just a few lobes are exhaust instead of intake? But the cam core is the same?
Learned something new Rusty. Boy that would screw with the port flow!Ford did exactly that with the 427 Tunnel Port engine. They put the pushrod tubes through the ports in the intake though and not the heads. Like this.
View attachment 1715446261
View attachment 1715446262
There was a guy in the southern states area that developed a small block LA Hemi head. His pricing was ridiculous. IIRC, they were 15K for the pair.I am waiting for small block Hemi heads.![]()
In my minds eye i thought you could still us a stock intake. drawing it out.....not so much.
View attachment 1715446253 View attachment 1715446254
In my minds eye i thought you could still us a stock intake. drawing it out.....not so much.
View attachment 1715446253 View attachment 1715446254
Now that we have a few more guys thinking about head flow think past the head. This may get you to understand shortside shaping. Let’s take a small block Mopar head and use it in our discussion. Where does the common wall side of an intake port dump into an engine cylinder. How about the pushrod side? Until you understand this it’s really hard to maximize head flow unless the guy teaching you showed you how. Most of us weren’t that lucky but it sure would have shortened my learning time and prevented a few sleepless nights. Like I told a few guys before I used to keep a pen and notepad by my bed at night for ideas that popped into my head while sleeping
There was a guy in the southern states area that developed a small block LA Hemi head. His pricing was ridiculous. IIRC, they were 15K for the pair.
Learned something new Rusty. Boy that would screw with the port flow!
I'm pretty green so go easy on me lol. In a perfect world it should follow the short turn and enter the cylinder on the ssr side of the valve correct? The roof and the floor ideally should be one column of air entering the cylinder. I can't get the image of 2 columns or more seperate airflow, outta my head. One for the roof, one for the floor or maybe a couple for each. Each one flowing a little different speed, moving different volumes of air. This is in regards to the speedmaster heads. The more gradual the short side radius the smoother the flow should be without shooting across the valve and shearing the upper column of air on the long side. Could be way off but the big problem aside from the prp is there is not enough meat in the ssr and maybe the floor is too low to get where we need to be? Kinda rambling here. It's entirely possible that I missed the point and started blabbing about what I feel the issue is lol.
I have now problem with this thread going off the tracks. aspeialy for a good brain teaser like this!!!!this may be a little deep right now. Disregard my post and we can go here later. Back to offset rockers.
I have lots of questions and ideas but I'm gonna wait for PBR. The less I post, the less he has to correct me lol
For now don’t worry about the top or bottom of the shortside. To get a good flowing head you have to widen the shortside so think far right and far left and where each side relates to an engine block. And why proper shaping in these areas is so important.
Overhead cams would take care of the pushrod pinch. Just saying....
My experimental factory iron head has found the water on the ssr the water in the bowl. hell i have even found oilAnd never forget...EVER...especially if you are grinding on iron heads there is water back there.
If you are serious about this stuff, make sure you sonic test all those areas. BTDT.
That's why the heads I'm running now are a bit low on flow. I'd already found some water on the final, finish work. Had to start completely over.

Thought of that, years ago and typed it here.I had this all typed up in Pittsburghracers thread. But decided it was a little to far of topic.
It something that that popped into my mind and i when HMMmmmmm.
I have been reading back threw all of these thread. and got to thinking............"Just a fantasy" but.................
There is just a limit for air flow without moving the PRP out of the way, which requires and offset rocker arm.
This would require a complete new head design. but.....
So, if you moved the pushrod over, the other way..........give it a second to sink in.....
If you pushed the push rod all the way into the port. For visualization let's say in the middle of the port. With a brass tube to seal the port.
now the short wall could be another long wall and the original long wall could be shifted slightly so that head bolt bulge wouldn't be there anymore.
Now i realize that it would eat up a lot more csa with a tube inside the port now but think of the area you could create at the waterfall. an area the air would...., could,.... should,.... flow much calmer.
I know it would cost way too much money to ever do.........but in fantasy land would it work.
what would be the reason why this wouldn't work.
Fe, sameFord did exactly that with the 427 Tunnel Port engine. They put the pushrod tubes through the ports in the intake though and not the heads. Like this.
View attachment 1715446261
View attachment 1715446262
Overhead cams would take care of the pushrod pinch. Just saying....
Thanks, Pa. fells.