A new head design (fantasy)

-
Isnt it just a few lobes are exhaust instead of intake? But the cam core is the same?
That could be. I think the poly has exhaust, intake,E,I,E,I,E,I and the LA has E,I,I,E,E,I,I,E
 
In my minds eye i thought you could still us a stock intake. drawing it out.....not so much.
View attachment 1715446253 View attachment 1715446254

Using mathematic formulas, you could figure out just how much space the pushrod tube would take up. I'm not sure if doing this would allow any bigger port than anything the aftermarket already offers, including all of the "W" series stuff. It would be interesting to find out.
 
In my minds eye i thought you could still us a stock intake. drawing it out.....not so much.
View attachment 1715446253 View attachment 1715446254


Once you get there, you have a big, round obstruction right on the middle of the port. And since pushrods are now getting up to 9/16 how much port displacement is that?

It's a bit harder to develop something that it looks like. Everything is in the way. And if you move it, it puts something else in the way.

It will eat you up. Like the guys who think a 4 valve head is the do all, be all, end all and try and fit that junk on anything.
 
Now that we have a few more guys thinking about head flow think past the head. This may get you to understand shortside shaping. Let’s take a small block Mopar head and use it in our discussion. Where does the common wall side of an intake port dump into an engine cylinder. How about the pushrod side? Until you understand this it’s really hard to maximize head flow unless the guy teaching you showed you how. Most of us weren’t that lucky but it sure would have shortened my learning time and prevented a few sleepless nights. Like I told a few guys before I used to keep a pen and notepad by my bed at night for ideas that popped into my head while sleeping

I'm pretty green so go easy on me lol. In a perfect world it should follow the short turn and enter the cylinder on the ssr side of the valve correct? The roof and the floor ideally should be one column of air entering the cylinder. I can't get the image of 2 columns or more seperate airflow, outta my head. One for the roof, one for the floor or maybe a couple for each. Each one flowing a little different speed, moving different volumes of air. This is in regards to the speedmaster heads. The more gradual the short side radius the smoother the flow should be without shooting across the valve and shearing the upper column of air on the long side. Could be way off but the big problem aside from the prp is there is not enough meat in the ssr and maybe the floor is too low to get where we need to be? Kinda rambling here. It's entirely possible that I missed the point and started blabbing about what I feel the issue is lol.
 
I'm pretty green so go easy on me lol. In a perfect world it should follow the short turn and enter the cylinder on the ssr side of the valve correct? The roof and the floor ideally should be one column of air entering the cylinder. I can't get the image of 2 columns or more seperate airflow, outta my head. One for the roof, one for the floor or maybe a couple for each. Each one flowing a little different speed, moving different volumes of air. This is in regards to the speedmaster heads. The more gradual the short side radius the smoother the flow should be without shooting across the valve and shearing the upper column of air on the long side. Could be way off but the big problem aside from the prp is there is not enough meat in the ssr and maybe the floor is too low to get where we need to be? Kinda rambling here. It's entirely possible that I missed the point and started blabbing about what I feel the issue is lol.

this may be a little deep right now. Disregard my post and we can go here later. Back to offset rockers.
 
All though i haven't though about it much. a pipe has the fastest speed and volume down the center of the pipe. so a cyl should react the same. there for the hardes pull should be on the short side......................
 
I have lots of questions and ideas but I'm gonna wait for PBR. The less I post, the less he has to correct me lol
 
I think some of the present aftermarket Pontiac heads still use the pushrod through the intake port, so they must have found benefit to it.
 
Yeah. Scroll down past the Pontiac Hemi heads and you'll see their version of the Ram Air V which still has the pushrod going through the intake port. Look at the size of the port, though. LOL

Kauffman Racing Equipment
 
I have lots of questions and ideas but I'm gonna wait for PBR. The less I post, the less he has to correct me lol


For now don’t worry about the top or bottom of the shortside. To get a good flowing head you have to widen the shortside so think far right and far left and where each side relates to an engine block. And why proper shaping in these areas is so important.
 
Stole your pic and doctored it up.
upload_2020-1-1_14-4-54.png
 

For now don’t worry about the top or bottom of the shortside. To get a good flowing head you have to widen the shortside so think far right and far left and where each side relates to an engine block. And why proper shaping in these areas is so important.


And never forget...EVER...especially if you are grinding on iron heads there is water back there.

If you are serious about this stuff, make sure you sonic test all those areas. BTDT.

That's why the heads I'm running now are a bit low on flow. I'd already found some water on the final, finish work. Had to start completely over.
 
Overhead cams would take care of the pushrod pinch. Just saying....

And finger follower ohc setups can Rev to the moon while remaining stable.
Chrysler had a good ohc follower setup in the 2.2/2.5 and 2.0/2.4 engines. Recycling them into a v8 head could be fun.
 
And never forget...EVER...especially if you are grinding on iron heads there is water back there.

If you are serious about this stuff, make sure you sonic test all those areas. BTDT.

That's why the heads I'm running now are a bit low on flow. I'd already found some water on the final, finish work. Had to start completely over.
My experimental factory iron head has found the water on the ssr the water in the bowl. hell i have even found oil :rofl:
 
I had this all typed up in Pittsburghracers thread. But decided it was a little to far of topic.
It something that that popped into my mind and i when HMMmmmmm.





I have been reading back threw all of these thread. and got to thinking............"Just a fantasy" but.................

There is just a limit for air flow without moving the PRP out of the way, which requires and offset rocker arm.
This would require a complete new head design. but.....

So, if you moved the pushrod over, the other way..........give it a second to sink in.....
If you pushed the push rod all the way into the port. For visualization let's say in the middle of the port. With a brass tube to seal the port.
now the short wall could be another long wall and the original long wall could be shifted slightly so that head bolt bulge wouldn't be there anymore.

Now i realize that it would eat up a lot more csa with a tube inside the port now but think of the area you could create at the waterfall. an area the air would...., could,.... should,.... flow much calmer.

I know it would cost way too much money to ever do.........but in fantasy land would it work.
what would be the reason why this wouldn't work.
Thought of that, years ago and typed it here.
O rings and push rod tubes. Nah. With that you automatically have to expect a negative.
Lol
just make everything taller, add a half inch to the intake port, valves, new intake manifold...and maybe headers, or a extended flange.
 
Overhead cams would take care of the pushrod pinch. Just saying....


And bring on a multitude of other issues. I don't think many people know why the Europeans (the east Asians have other reasons but some are similar) are so in love with small displacement engines.

TAXES. That's the number one reason why they love their small displacement junk. TAXES. They are taxed on displacement. The bigger the engine, the bigger the taxes.

The smaller the engine, the harder it is to get a single valve with enough area so they use multiple valves, and because everything is small, they use overhead cams becuse of space.

I've never been impressed with OHC stuff, and before anyone asks, yes, I'm aware of F1 and all the 4 stroke dirt bike junk that the media harped on for years about how they all use "F1" technology when a 2 stoke of equal displacement will kill a 4 stroke.
 
Well, I've been impressed with OHC for a long time. No such thing as valve train stability issues. I've owned a 2000 BMW M5 for ten years. That comes with a 400hp 5 liter, all aluminum DOHC, four valve per cylinder V8. Essentially the Ford Coyote was modeled after it, in my opinion. The exhaust is very restrictive and a set of headers and tune is worth almost 50hp. That motor is a work of art and is more than twenty years old now. Way ahead of everything else at the time. Overhead cams and variable valve timing allow you to do things that a pushrod engine only dream of. A lot of it is aimed at efficiency and fuel economy of course, but you can make some serious power. Multiple valves allow more area for flow in a given chamber area, rather than a single big valve with a lot of wasted space around it. Biggest downside with the BMW motor is the engine controller is locked up and figuring out the variable cam timing in a standalone controller is like black magic. A lot harder for a backyard hot rodder to tinker with, but the system is capable. Kinda looks like a hemi.
s-l1600.jpg

s-l1600.jpg
 
-
Back
Top Bottom