NukeBass
Well-Known Member
I really know the answer to that question, but here's how it relates to my recent motor experience.
I got my 73 Duster restored at a shop recently (long project, took two years, ugh) as outlined in the 73 B3 Duster thread in the restorations section. The guy I took it to runs a shop and had a separate guy, a friend of his, build the motor. It used to have a slant six and I decided to do a swap with a 340 block I found at Carlisle a couple of years ago. In the process, I also went with a TKO-500 transmission because I liked the idea of an overdrive gear.
In my discussions with both the motor guy and the shop guy, I thought I was clear in describing that I wanted a driver car. I know a 340 can be and is a powerful motor, but I was looking for something stock-ish that I could easily drive around town because my intent was, and still is, to drive the car frequently and with the family. I wanted it to be a fun time car with a bit of power. I figured that back in 73, people would use 340s as everyday drivers and they would be okay in that purpose. Nothing too powerful or too rough, or at least that was my understanding from my father's descriptions.
The few times the motor guy and I talked, it seemed like we were on the same page and, when we first talked, he spoke of something around 300-325 hp with improved parts and tolerances and so forth and I'm thinking, "great, better tolerances means better efficiency." At one point he said I may even be able to get around 14 or 15 mpg with it, which is about what I was getting in my slant before I replaced it. I thought we were good to go and I had no worries about the motor.
A couple of years has passed and I finally hear the car run the day I go pick it up. The shop guy put it in a local show and I met him there and rode back to his shop in it. To me, it idled really rough and was really loud (now, I did put TTI headers on it with the standard mufflers that come with the A body headers, so that may be some of the loud). I asked the guy about the idle and he said you can't get a smooth idle with this kind of performance. You have one or the other.
So, I pick up the car and drive it home, all the while not liking the idle on the thing and thinking it runs a lot stronger than I imagined. My father was with me and said he thought it sounded more like a 440 than a 340 and that, from what he understood about motors, they put an aggressive cam in it. Now, keep in mind as I tell this story that I know little about motors except some basic premises. I know nothing about how to build and match parts for specific applications or anything like that which is why I had someone else do all of this work.
After a couple of days, including experiencing difficult starting that is probably due to a rebuilt carburetor (that will be fixed), I call the shop guy back. In our discussions, initially about getting the car to start, I complain about the idle and say that I think I got a high performance engine instead of a driver. He said I was talking about wanting 400 hp, which I never said. He also said that if I wanted it smoother, the cam would probably have to change.
I call the motor guy, and he said it was a mild cam and it wasn't idling all of that rough. He said there really isn't anything we can do without major engine modification (changing the cam at least), but we were going for 375 hp. I told him I wanted a driver and I never said anything about 375 hp. The last time we talked about numbers (we're talking two years ago) he said 300-325 hp so I have no idea where 375 came from.
Okay, so with all of that being said (sorry for the long story, but I am still somewhat in the venting phase about this project), am I crazy in thinking that a 340 can be built to be a decent driver car with a fairly smooth idle? I know it is going to have some power behind it and will idle a little bit rough, but I think what I have is excessive for what I was pretty certain I asked for in the beginning. The motor guy said that he could have gotten me a 318 with a 2bbl carb, but I had the 340 block and so on.
I looked at the paperwork I have and this is the cam they put in it. http://www.compperformancegroupstor...Product_Code=20-224-4&Category_Code=LACAMHFXE
Like I said, I don't know really anything about what various cams do so I don't know if changing the camshaft is an answer or possible solution to what I want. If it is, that's extra time and cost to an already waaaaaayyyyyy over budget project. I'm hoping they work with me on this, but I have nothing written down saying explicitly what I wanted. Granted, I have nothing written down saying 400 hp, either, but I'm worried all of the cost will come back to me.
So, aside from being the only man on the planet to want less power (I am simple person with a wife and two kids who just wanted to spruce up the car I grew up in and have something fun to drive), am I totally crazy in wanting a 340 for this application?
I got my 73 Duster restored at a shop recently (long project, took two years, ugh) as outlined in the 73 B3 Duster thread in the restorations section. The guy I took it to runs a shop and had a separate guy, a friend of his, build the motor. It used to have a slant six and I decided to do a swap with a 340 block I found at Carlisle a couple of years ago. In the process, I also went with a TKO-500 transmission because I liked the idea of an overdrive gear.
In my discussions with both the motor guy and the shop guy, I thought I was clear in describing that I wanted a driver car. I know a 340 can be and is a powerful motor, but I was looking for something stock-ish that I could easily drive around town because my intent was, and still is, to drive the car frequently and with the family. I wanted it to be a fun time car with a bit of power. I figured that back in 73, people would use 340s as everyday drivers and they would be okay in that purpose. Nothing too powerful or too rough, or at least that was my understanding from my father's descriptions.
The few times the motor guy and I talked, it seemed like we were on the same page and, when we first talked, he spoke of something around 300-325 hp with improved parts and tolerances and so forth and I'm thinking, "great, better tolerances means better efficiency." At one point he said I may even be able to get around 14 or 15 mpg with it, which is about what I was getting in my slant before I replaced it. I thought we were good to go and I had no worries about the motor.
A couple of years has passed and I finally hear the car run the day I go pick it up. The shop guy put it in a local show and I met him there and rode back to his shop in it. To me, it idled really rough and was really loud (now, I did put TTI headers on it with the standard mufflers that come with the A body headers, so that may be some of the loud). I asked the guy about the idle and he said you can't get a smooth idle with this kind of performance. You have one or the other.
So, I pick up the car and drive it home, all the while not liking the idle on the thing and thinking it runs a lot stronger than I imagined. My father was with me and said he thought it sounded more like a 440 than a 340 and that, from what he understood about motors, they put an aggressive cam in it. Now, keep in mind as I tell this story that I know little about motors except some basic premises. I know nothing about how to build and match parts for specific applications or anything like that which is why I had someone else do all of this work.
After a couple of days, including experiencing difficult starting that is probably due to a rebuilt carburetor (that will be fixed), I call the shop guy back. In our discussions, initially about getting the car to start, I complain about the idle and say that I think I got a high performance engine instead of a driver. He said I was talking about wanting 400 hp, which I never said. He also said that if I wanted it smoother, the cam would probably have to change.
I call the motor guy, and he said it was a mild cam and it wasn't idling all of that rough. He said there really isn't anything we can do without major engine modification (changing the cam at least), but we were going for 375 hp. I told him I wanted a driver and I never said anything about 375 hp. The last time we talked about numbers (we're talking two years ago) he said 300-325 hp so I have no idea where 375 came from.
Okay, so with all of that being said (sorry for the long story, but I am still somewhat in the venting phase about this project), am I crazy in thinking that a 340 can be built to be a decent driver car with a fairly smooth idle? I know it is going to have some power behind it and will idle a little bit rough, but I think what I have is excessive for what I was pretty certain I asked for in the beginning. The motor guy said that he could have gotten me a 318 with a 2bbl carb, but I had the 340 block and so on.
I looked at the paperwork I have and this is the cam they put in it. http://www.compperformancegroupstor...Product_Code=20-224-4&Category_Code=LACAMHFXE
Like I said, I don't know really anything about what various cams do so I don't know if changing the camshaft is an answer or possible solution to what I want. If it is, that's extra time and cost to an already waaaaaayyyyyy over budget project. I'm hoping they work with me on this, but I have nothing written down saying explicitly what I wanted. Granted, I have nothing written down saying 400 hp, either, but I'm worried all of the cost will come back to me.
So, aside from being the only man on the planet to want less power (I am simple person with a wife and two kids who just wanted to spruce up the car I grew up in and have something fun to drive), am I totally crazy in wanting a 340 for this application?